Multi-location law firm review analysis

Morgan & Morgan Reviews, Ratings & Complaints by Location

Also searched as: Morgan and Morgan

Law Leaderboard tracks 88,523 public Google reviews across 23 distinct Morgan & Morgan office profiles in 22 cities. Their review-count-weighted rating is 4.60/5. The table below shows why the office-level evidence matters before treating one brand name as one uniform experience.

23
Office profiles
22
Cities covered
4.60
Weighted rating
92%
Owner-reply signal
10%
Recommendation signal

Quick verdict from public review data

Is Morgan & Morgan a good or legitimate law firm?

Morgan & Morgan's 23 tracked office profiles have a 4.60/5 review-count-weighted public Google rating across 88,523 reviews. The office ratings range from 4.4-4.8/5, so the office table is more useful than a single brand-wide label. Public feedback can support a shortlist, but it cannot establish legal ability, likely case results, or fit for a particular matter.

Experiences vary by office

Chicago, Illinois has the highest office rating in this dataset at 4.8/5 across 2,122 tracked reviews. Orlando, Florida has the lowest at 4.4/5 across 19,786 tracked reviews. This range describes the captured office profiles only and does not prove why experiences differ.

Owner-response behavior

Across retrieved reviews, the weighted owner-reply signal for the tracked Morgan & Morgan offices is 92%. This measures public responses to Google reviews, not communication with clients during a case.

Complaints and negative-review signals

Across the analyzed office samples, the most prominent recurring concern labels are unprofessional (7%), poor communication (4%), low settlement (2%). These are weighted review-text signals, not verified complaint counts or findings of misconduct.

What Law Leaderboard can verify

Law Leaderboard can confirm 23 public Google Business listings connected by the same firm website domain, forthepeople.com. This does not independently verify every lawyer's license, disciplinary history, insurance, or fit for a specific case. Verify the office and attorneys with the relevant state bar before hiring.

Multi-office consistency benchmark

How Consistent Is Morgan & Morgan Across Tracked Offices?

Multi-office brand dispersion shows how public-review evidence varies among offices associated with the same brand across the listed markets or profiles. A smaller or larger spread can add context when comparing locations, but it does not establish uniform service, legal ability, credentials, or results at any individual office.

Average evidence score
52.1/100
Score range
18.2

points across eligible offices

Score spread
4.3

population standard deviation

Rating range
0.4

public rating points

Scored offices
23/23

Evidence depth by office

extensive
8
insufficient
0
minimum
0
moderate
8
strong
7

QA-published themes across covered offices

Each denominator includes only offices whose result for that theme passed all publication gates.

Communication557 matches / 19,767 analyzed texts · 15 offices
2.8%
Responsiveness and delays275 matches / 19,400 analyzed texts · 13 offices
1.4%
Outcome language (unverified)181 matches / 18,200 analyzed texts · 10 offices
1.0%

Immutable brand ID: llb-brand-morgan-and-morgan. Compare individual offices side by side.

Morgan & Morgan Reviews by Office

Ordered by tracked public review volume. Ratings and counts are office-specific; the response and recommendation columns use the review sample available for each profile.

OfficeEvidence scoreLocal percentileEvidence depthRatingTrackedAnalyzedOwner repliesRecommend
Orlando, Florida
20 N Orange Ave Ste 1600, Orlando, FL 32801
41.8/100 6.2th Extensive 4.4/5 19,786 4,518 91% 14%
Atlanta, Georgia
191 Peachtree Rd NE Suite 4200, Atlanta, GA 30303
47.7/100 7.3th Moderate 4.5/5 11,631 200 89% 22%
Los Angeles, California
633 W 5th St #2200, Los Angeles, CA 90071
51.8/100 6.7th Extensive 4.7/5 6,931 2,095 95% 9%
Tampa, Florida
201 N Franklin St 7th Floor, Tampa, FL 33602
52.1/100 2.4th Extensive 4.7/5 6,775 2,212 95% 9%
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
2005 Market St Ste. 350, Philadelphia, PA 19103
45.6/100 7.9th Extensive 4.6/5 6,621 1,910 96% 8%
Jacksonville, Florida
501 Riverside Ave #1200, Jacksonville, FL 32202
47.2/100 3.6th Extensive 4.6/5 5,640 2,373 95% 7%
Nashville, Tennessee
150 4th Ave N Suite 300, Nashville, TN 37219
49.9/100 3.6th Extensive 4.7/5 5,431 1,409 96% 9%
Miami, Florida
703 Waterford Way #1000, Miami, FL 33126
52.8/100 2.4th Extensive 4.7/5 4,680 1,698 94% 11%
Houston, Texas
16225 Park Ten Pl # 500, Houston, TX 77084
50.9/100 2.4th Strong 4.7/5 3,043 670 95% 9%
Phoenix, Arizona
2355 E Camelback Rd Suite 335, Phoenix, AZ 85016
48/100 13.3th Extensive 4.6/5 2,846 1,115 94% 6%
Tampa, Florida
3705 N Himes Ave West, Tampa, FL 33607
47.5/100 9.1th Strong 4.7/5 2,780 596 78% 10%
Charlotte, North Carolina
525 N Tryon St Suite 1729, Charlotte, NC 28202
51.1/100 2.7th Strong 4.7/5 2,192 455 89% 11%
Chicago, Illinois
332 S Michigan Ave #900, Chicago, IL 60603
57.3/100 7.7th Strong 4.8/5 2,122 463 94% 4%
Baltimore, Maryland
400 E Pratt St 8th Floor, Suites 801 & 833, Baltimore, MD 21202
57.6/100 18.2th Strong 4.8/5 1,465 282 98% 6%
Las Vegas, Nevada
6725 Via Austi Pkwy Suite 275, Las Vegas, NV 89119
54.7/100 6.7th Strong 4.7/5 1,445 333 93% 10%
Seattle, Washington
506 2nd Ave Suite 1513, Seattle, WA 98104
54.8/100 3.8th Strong 4.7/5 886 267 98% 8%
Denver, Colorado
999 18th St UNIT 3000, Denver, CO 80202
50.9/100 3.1th Moderate 4.7/5 803 174 95% 7%
San Francisco, California
1390 Market St #200, San Francisco, CA 94102
55.8/100 5.9th Moderate 4.8/5 691 180 85% 8%
Dallas, Texas
4514 Cole Ave # 600, Dallas, TX 75205
54.3/100 6.1th Moderate 4.8/5 687 130 95% 11%
Minneapolis, Minnesota
121 N Washington Ave 4th Floor, Minneapolis, MN 55401
56.6/100 5th Moderate 4.7/5 580 102 97% 10%
Sacramento, California
180 Promenade Cir Suite 300, Sacramento, CA 95834
55.8/100 5.3th Moderate 4.8/5 548 113 97% 7%
San Diego, California
770 First Ave. Ste 250, San Diego, CA 92101
60/100 4th Moderate 4.8/5 483 100 96% 4%
Portland, Oregon
1050 SW 6th Ave #1100, Portland, OR 97204
54.2/100 4.3th Moderate 4.7/5 457 113 95% 2%

The largest public review footprint in this dataset is Orlando, Florida, with 19,786 tracked reviews. Volume is not the same as quality.

Recurring Praise Signals

Weighted across the office review-text samples where each label appears.

  • professionalism15%
  • recommendation10%
  • communication8%
  • results7%
  • speed7%

Recurring Complaint Signals

Labels derived from analyzed negative-review text; not verified complaint filings.

  • unprofessional7%
  • poor communication4%
  • low settlement2%
  • slow process2%
  • passed around2%

Morgan & Morgan Reviews, Complaints and Settlement Questions

These answers separate the branded questions people search from what this public-review dataset can actually establish.

Morgan & Morgan negative reviews

Across the analyzed office samples, the most prominent recurring concern labels are unprofessional (7%), poor communication (4%), low settlement (2%). These are weighted review-text signals, not verified complaint counts or findings of misconduct.

Morgan & Morgan settlement reviews

The current review dataset cannot verify Morgan & Morgan settlement quality, settlement amounts, win rates, or expected case value. Review texts may mention settlements or results, but those statements are unverified client accounts and are not normalized case outcomes. Ask the relevant office about experience, fee terms, and how it evaluates cases like yours.

Is Morgan & Morgan legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm 23 public Google Business listings connected by the same firm website domain, forthepeople.com. This does not independently verify every lawyer's license, disciplinary history, insurance, or fit for a specific case. Verify the office and attorneys with the relevant state bar before hiring.

Review consistency by city

Chicago, Illinois has the highest office rating in this dataset at 4.8/5 across 2,122 tracked reviews. Orlando, Florida has the lowest at 4.4/5 across 19,786 tracked reviews. This range describes the captured office profiles only and does not prove why experiences differ.

Morgan & Morgan Review Questions

What do Morgan & Morgan reviews say?

Law Leaderboard tracks 88,523 public Google reviews across 23 distinct Morgan & Morgan office profiles in 22 cities. Their review-count-weighted rating is 4.60/5. The current dataset retrieved 29,714 reviews and analyzed 21,508 review texts. Read the office table because experiences and review coverage vary by location.

Is Morgan & Morgan legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm 23 public Google Business listings connected by the same firm website domain, forthepeople.com. This does not independently verify every lawyer's license, disciplinary history, insurance, or fit for a specific case. Verify the office and attorneys with the relevant state bar before hiring.

Which Morgan & Morgan office has the best reviews?

Morgan & Morgan in Chicago, Illinois has the highest public Google rating in this dataset at 4.8/5 across 2,122 tracked reviews. Ties are broken by public review volume; this is not an endorsement or a prediction of service quality.

What do Morgan & Morgan complaints and negative reviews mention?

Across the analyzed office samples, the most prominent recurring concern labels are unprofessional (7%), poor communication (4%), low settlement (2%). These are weighted review-text signals, not verified complaint counts or findings of misconduct.

How This Brand Comparison Is Calculated

Office profiles are joined only when they share the configured firm website domain, then deduplicated by Google place ID or address. Aggregate ratings are weighted by each office's tracked review count. Response signals are weighted by retrieved reviews, and text-derived themes are weighted by analyzed review texts. See the national review benchmark for cross-market context and the full methodology for metric definitions.

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • 23 distinct Google Business office profiles linked to forthepeople.com in the current Law Leaderboard dataset.
  • • 88,523 public Google reviews tracked, 29,714 review records retrieved, and 21,508 review texts analyzed across those profiles.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4 supplies the exact office-to-brand relationship, evidence-score dispersion, evidence-strength tiers, and QA-published review-language themes.
  • • Office profile records used for address, city, aggregate rating, owner-response, praise, complaint, and review-consistency signals.

Freshness

  • • Latest source record represented by this page: 2026-08-12.
  • • Business-profile source range: 2026-04-02 to 2026-08-09; review-record source range: 2026-04-02 to 2026-08-11.
  • • Current coverage: 23 office profiles across 22 cities and 15 states.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; this derived-release date is not a new office or review observation.
  • • This static aggregation is regenerated when a new source dataset is published; profiles can have different source dates.

Limitations

  • • Only offices present in the current Law Leaderboard dataset are included; this is not a complete corporate location directory.
  • • Office ratings are public Google aggregates, while derived themes use only the review texts retrieved and analyzed in the current build.
  • • Domain matching connects office profiles to a brand; it does not establish franchise, ownership, licensing, or disciplinary status.
  • • Brand consistency describes dispersion among covered offices only. It does not establish uniform service or explain why office results differ.
  • • Theme prevalence includes only offices whose individual result passed the current publication gates; omitted offices are not treated as zero mentions.