Review-signal comparison · Existing data only
Based on Law Leaderboard's 2026-08-03 review dataset, the first three firms in this Chicago car-accident comparison are Midwest Injury Lawyers (5/5), Stephen R. Martay, Attorney At Law (4.9/5), Abels & Annes, P.C. (5/5). Eligibility requires at least 50 analyzed review texts plus a car- or auto-accident signal in the firm's name or analyzed case-type labels. The order preserves the existing Chicago personal-injury ranking after applying that filter; it is not a guarantee of fit or outcome.
Specific evidence shortcuts, not sponsored winners, legal endorsements, or predictions of case outcomes.
Staver Accident Injury Lawyers, P.C.: 5/5 across 314 tracked reviews. Ties broken by volume.
Malman Law: 5,068 tracked public Google reviews.
Stephen R. Martay, Attorney At Law: 100% of retrieved reviews have an owner reply. This is not case communication.
Midwest Injury Lawyers: 94% explicit recommendation signal in the analyzed sample.
Midwest Injury Lawyers: highest consistency index among eligible profiles (100).
Ordered by the parent personal-injury ranking after applying the published eligibility filter.
| Rank | Firm | Rating | Tracked | Analyzed | Owner replies | Recommend | Top concern label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Midwest Injury Lawyers | 5/5 | 127 | 109 | 97% | 94% | No recurring label |
| 2 | Stephen R. Martay, Attorney At Law | 4.9/5 | 418 | 331 | 100% | 68% | poor communication (25%) |
| 3 | Abels & Annes, P.C. | 5/5 | 237 | 220 | 17% | 85% | No recurring label |
| 4 | Gainsberg Injury and Accident Lawyers | 4.9/5 | 482 | 400 | 76% | 76% | unprofessional (118%) |
| 5 | Staver Accident Injury Lawyers, P.C. | 5/5 | 314 | 270 | 17% | 87% | unprofessional (250%) |
| 6 | Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard P.C. | 4.8/5 | 207 | 193 | 77% | 75% | No recurring label |
| 7 | Trapp & Geller | 5/5 | 201 | 163 | 0% | 77% | No recurring label |
| 8 | Attorneys of Chicago Personal Injury Lawyers | 4.9/5 | 116 | 110 | 24% | 79% | No recurring label |
| 9 | Ankin Law | 4.8/5 | 1,364 | 1,156 | 91% | 51% | unprofessional (22%) |
| 10 | Phillips Law Offices | 4.8/5 | 107 | 97 | 63% | 87% | poor communication (20%) |
| 11 | 844SeeMike Personal Injury Lawyers | 4.9/5 | 1,247 | 1,073 | 44% | 55% | unprofessional (13%) |
| 12 | The Kryder Law Group, LLC Accident and Injury Lawyers | 4.9/5 | 534 | 326 | 68% | 56% | unprofessional (21%) |
| 13 | Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers LLC | 4.8/5 | 405 | 381 | 92% | 50% | unprofessional (15%) |
| 14 | Powell and Pisman | 4.9/5 | 441 | 276 | 20% | 53% | unprofessional (23%) |
| 15 | Malman Law | 4.8/5 | 5,068 | 4,296 | 69% | 36% | unprofessional (15%) |
| 16 | Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Ltd. | 4.9/5 | 1,101 | 409 | 4% | 46% | unprofessional (31%) |
| 17 | Levin & Perconti | 4.7/5 | 614 | 319 | 68% | 51% | unprofessional (10%) |
| 18 | Costa Ivone Injury Lawyers - Chicago | 4.7/5 | 1,147 | 833 | 63% | 40% | unprofessional (22%) |
| 19 | Morgan & Morgan | 4.8/5 | 2,122 | 463 | 94% | 4% | unprofessional (7%) |
| 20 | Walner Law | 4.4/5 | 511 | 378 | 85% | 27% | unprofessional (32%) |
Weighted NLP labels from eligible profiles' analyzed negative-review text. These are not complaint filings or findings of misconduct.
Based on Law Leaderboard's 2026-08-03 review dataset, the first three firms in this Chicago car-accident comparison are Midwest Injury Lawyers (5/5), Stephen R. Martay, Attorney At Law (4.9/5), Abels & Annes, P.C. (5/5). Eligibility requires at least 50 analyzed review texts plus a car- or auto-accident signal in the firm's name or analyzed case-type labels. The order preserves the existing Chicago personal-injury ranking after applying that filter; it is not a guarantee of fit or outcome.
Each profile must appear in the existing Chicago personal-injury dataset, have at least 50 analyzed review texts, and contain a car- or auto-accident signal in its analyzed case-type labels or public business name. Law Leaderboard then preserves the parent city ranking order. No new firm data or sponsored placement is added for this page.
Across the eligible Chicago profiles, the strongest recurring concern labels are unprofessional (27%), passed around (8%), poor communication (5%). These are weighted NLP labels from analyzed negative-review text, not verified complaint filings or misconduct findings.
Many injury firms advertise contingency-fee arrangements, but the percentage, litigation-stage changes, case costs, and lien treatment vary by firm and jurisdiction. Ask every shortlisted firm for a written explanation of fees and costs before signing. This review dataset does not establish a market-wide fee.
Use the table to compare the public rating, review volume, analyzed-text coverage, owner replies, explicit recommendation language, review consistency, and recurring concerns. Then verify attorney licensing, relevant experience, fee terms, who will handle the case, and current availability directly.
This page does not introduce a new score or scrape new firms. It filters the existing Chicago personal injury lawyer ranking to profiles with at least 50 analyzed review texts and a car-accident signal, then preserves the parent order. See the full methodology and national review benchmark.