Ankin Law Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

10 N Dearborn St #500, Chicago, IL 60602

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

4.8
1,364 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Ankin Law is a personal injury attorney in Chicago, Illinois with a 4.8-star rating across 1,364 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 1,368 reviews for this profile and analyzed 1,156 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 91% of retrieved reviews, 51% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 17% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 89.4.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (51%), professionalism (29%), and case results (22%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, motorcycle, and slip and fall. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Ankin Law Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (51%), professionalism (29%), and case results (22%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Ankin Law legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Ankin Law at 10 N Dearborn St #500, Chicago, IL 60602. The listing has 1,364 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Ankin Law a good law firm?

Ankin Law has a 4.8/5 public Google rating across 1,364 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 1,368 reviews and analyzed 1,156 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 91% of retrieved reviews, 51% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 17% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Ankin Law reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (22%) and poor communication (4%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Ankin Law respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 91% of the reviews retrieved for Ankin Law. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 17% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score72/100Extensive evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile46.2th percentileCompared with the fixed Chicago, IL cohort.
Tracked Google reviews1,364Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved1,368Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed1,156Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate91%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate51%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions17%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index89.4Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Chicago, IL

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

72/100

Score percentile

46.2th percentile

Rating percentile

43.6th percentile

Review-count percentile

94.9th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Extensive evidence from 1,156 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-b9256eaae3acc640
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-6a2a9941ddf2ce2a
Brand relationship
Ankin Law

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

6.3%

73 matches: 68 positive, 5 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

4.7%

54 matches: 38 positive, 0 negative, 16 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

2.9%

34 matches: 31 positive, 3 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Oct 24, 2013

Latest dated review

Jul 31, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

1,364 retrieved of 1,364 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

169

Average rating: 4.56/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.02 stars

4.56/5 in the recent period vs. 4.54/5 in the prior period

Review activity

+18 reviews

169 recent reviews vs. 151 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

78%

50 replies across 64 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

92%

1,189 replies across 1,300 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidenttruck accidentmotorcycleslip and fallmedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
7.4
Avg Review Length
278 chars
Local Guide %
22%

Practice Areas

Civil law attorneyLaw firmAttorneySocial security attorneyTrial attorney

About

Chicago personal injury & workers' compensation lawyers have been helping injured victims in Chicago and the surrounding areas since 1940. We offer free consultations, are available 24/7, and we can e...

Source-Backed Website Signals

Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.

Intake And Fee Signals

Free consultation stated Contingency fee mentioned No fee unless recovery stated Contact form observed Phone intake observed

Languages And Practice Signals

Languages
Spanish
Practice Areas Mentioned On Site
bicycle accident brain injury car accident dog bite medical malpractice motorcycle accident pedestrian accident product liability slip and fall truck accident workers compensation wrongful death

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 1,156 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
91%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
51%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
17%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
29%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
22%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
7%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 168 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
1245 (91%)
4 star
55 (4%)
3 star
12 (<1%)
2 star
16 (1.2%)
1 star
36 (2.6%)
96% positive reviews 4% negative reviews Consistency index: 89.4

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 51.3% of reviews
professionalism 29.4% of reviews
case results 22.3% of reviews
communication 17.1% of reviews
speed 9.7% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (21.6%)
poor communication (3.9%)

Questions & Answers

Q: I hurt my back at work about a month ago and I thought the pain would go away. Is it too late to get workers' comp?

A: The deadline to file a workers' compensation claim for a back injury in Illinois is three years from the day the injury occurred. However, if you haven't reported your injury to your employer, you should do so in writing right away. State law allows you just 45 days to report a work-related accident...

— Ankin Law

Q: I was hurt in a wreck in Chicago but I live in Wisconsin. Can you still help me?

A: Jurisdiction issues can be complicated when the parties live out of state. Generally speaking, if you were injured in an Illinois car accident, we can help you file a personal injury claim right here in Illinois. While the majority of your case can be handled by mail or over the phone, you may be re...

— Ankin Law

Q: Can you tell me how much money I can get for my injuries before I hire you?

A: Every case is fact-specific. To determine the estimated value of your case, we need to fully understand how the injury occurred and what your damages are. And even when we know this information, our assessment is just an educated guess. Ultimately, how much you recover is dependent on many factors, ...

— Ankin Law

Q: How much money do I need to have upfront to sue for injuries?

A: At Ankin Law Office, we'll shoulder the financial burden of pursuing your personal injury claim so you won't need to worry about upfront expenses. Since we work on a contingency fee basis, we'll provide you with free legal advice, cover the cost of investigating your case, negotiate with insurers, a...

— Ankin Law

Q: I was hurt in a car accident and the other driver was drunk. Can I still get money for my injuries if he didn't get a DUI?

A: Criminal and civil law are separate, but sometimes related areas of law. While the defendant’s conviction for a DUI would be helpful in proving your personal injury case, it isn’t necessary. Even without it, there may very well be enough evidence to prove the other party was at fault and caused your...

— Ankin Law

Q: Do you Handle worker's compensation cases, dealing with cardiac arrest while working in a stressful environment.

A: Hi Robert. Generally speaking, we are accepting a large variety of worker's compensation cases. Please give us a call to discuss the details of your case: 312-600-0000

— Ankin Law

Q: If I slip on someone's property and broke my ankle do I have a case?

A: Hi Hildred, You may have a case, it depends on several factors. Please call our office and ask to speak to one of the attorneys. Let them know you asked a question on Facebook and we directed you to call. As always, there's never a charge unless we collect on your behalf. Thank you for visiting ou...

— Ankin Law

Q: Do y'all take veterans cases concerning their service connection claims for compensation

A: Hi Edward, It really depends on the fact pattern. Please give our office a call, one of our attorneys is happy to discuss your case. Our phone number is (312) 970-9353. Best, Rafi

— Ankin Law

Q: I am injured myself at work and I was told by worker comp that they only pay if i miss 3 scheduled days of work. My job would have to pay for for the half of day of the I did the day I was injured as well. Is any of this true in Illioni?

A: Sheree, Please give us a call at your earliest convenience at: 312-600-0000 and share the details of your injury with us. Wer'e here to help and are looking forward to talking to you.

— Ankin Law

Q: What are the chances my personal injury case will go to trial?

A: Atkins Law will fight for every penny they feel you are due. So if an agreement can't be reached then yes prepare for court because Atkins won't bail on you. Hope this helps you

— Donna Claybourne

Q: What types of civil rights cases do you handle?

A: Our civil rights lawyers at Ankin Law have experience handling varying types of civil rights cases, including employment discrimination, housing discrimination, public accomodations discrimination, voting rights violations, police misconduct, and first amendment violations. If you have been subjecte...

— Ankin Law

Q: Do you need English/Spanish translators/over the phone/video interpreters?

A: Good morning Ivis, We are always on the look out for talented people to join the Ankin Law team. Please contact us at 312.600.0000 and ask for Human Resources.

— Ankin Law

Q: I just got hurt at work about 4 hours ago. What do I do?

A: Ankin Law Office is amazing. They will be great for you!!

— Matt Decker

Q: do you handle theft cases?

A: It depends on the case. Please contact us and relay the details of your case at 312-600-0000 to get a more detailed answer.

— Ankin Law

Q: What if the owner of the dog that bit me says I provoked the attack?

A: Even if a dog owner claims you provoked the attack, you may still have a valid claim. Illinois recognizes comparative fault. Therefore, compensation can be reduced if you share some responsibility, but it doesn't automatically bar recovery. The key is proving the dog owner failed to take reasonable ...

— Ankin Law

Q: Can I file a claim for medical bills or missed work related to a pressure cooker injury?

A: The short answer is yes, you may be able to file a claim for medical bills and lost wages stemming from a pressure cooker injury. When a defective product, such as a pressure cooker, causes injury, the manufacturer can be held liable. The key is to prove that the product was defective in its design,...

— Ankin Law

Q: If I was consuming the soup in a public place in Chicago, like a food court or restaurant, and the seating or table contributed to the spill, who is liable?

A: Food courts and restaurant owners can be held liable for injuries caused by faulty furinishings. In Illinois, the owner or operator of a public place like a food court or restaurant has a legal duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition for visitors. This includes ensuring that s...

— Ankin Law

Q: How is my percentage of fault determined in a Chicago car accident, and who makes this determination?

A: In Chicago, your percentage of fault in a car accident is determined using Illinois’ comparative negligence system. As such, fault is divided among all parties involved based on their actions leading up to the crash. If you are found to be 50% or more at fault, you cannot recover damages. If you are...

— Ankin Law

Q: I used Hydroxycut for a short time before developing adverse health effects. Can I file a lawsuit?

A: Yes, you can file a lawsuit against Hydroxycut if you have developed adverse health effects from using the product. The popular weight loss supplement has been linked to serious health problems, including liver damage, heart problems, and seizures. If you have suffered these or other such issues aft...

— Ankin Law

Q: Can I sue for pain and suffering after a truck accident?

A: Yes, you can sue for pain and suffering after a truck accident in Chicago if you can prove that the truck driver's negligence caused you to suffer. You may be entitled to compensation for your physical and emotional pain, suffering, and distress. This includes things such as physical discomfort, men...

— Ankin Law

Other Personal Injury in Chicago

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 1,368 retrieved reviews and 1,156 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • 1 captured pages from the firm's website support the displayed self-reported intake signals, languages, and practice-area mentions.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 12:25:51.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:12; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:22.
  • 1,364 total Google reviews tracked; 1,368 reviews retrieved; 1,156 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Chicago personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Illinois personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Truck Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Workers' Compensation cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →