100 N LaSalle St Ste 1710, Chicago, IL 60602
Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.
Abels & Annes, P.C. is a personal injury attorney in Chicago, Illinois with a 5.0-star rating across 237 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 237 reviews for this profile and analyzed 220 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 17% of retrieved reviews, 85% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 27% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 99.5.
The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (85%), case results (34%), and professionalism (31%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, slip and fall, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (85%), case results (34%), and professionalism (31%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Abels & Annes, P.C. at 100 N LaSalle St Ste 1710, Chicago, IL 60602. The listing has 237 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Abels & Annes, P.C. has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 237 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 237 reviews and analyzed 220 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 17% of retrieved reviews, 85% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 27% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
The current analyzed sample does not contain a recurring complaint category for Abels & Annes, P.C.. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.
Public review data shows an owner reply on 17% of the reviews retrieved for Abels & Annes, P.C.. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 27% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 79.1/100 | Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 82.1th percentile | Compared with the fixed Chicago, IL cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 237 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 237 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 220 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 17% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 85% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 27% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Consistency index | 99.5 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
79.1/100
Score percentile
82.1th percentile
Rating percentile
100th percentile
Review-count percentile
64.1th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
Not scored
Moderate evidence from 220 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
10.0%
22 matches: 19 positive, 0 negative, 3 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.
7.7%
17 matches: 17 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
3.6%
8 matches: 8 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 6, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Jan 19, 2016
Latest dated review
Apr 3, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
237 retrieved of 237 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
26
Average rating: 5.00/5
Average rating
0.00 stars
5.00/5 in the recent period vs. 5.00/5 in the prior period
Review activity
+11 reviews
26 recent reviews vs. 15 in the prior period
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
If you have been seriously injured in an accident, the Chicago personal injury attorneys at Abels & Annes are ready to help. We are passionate about seeking justice and compensation for those who have...
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Based on analysis of 220 text reviews in the current build.
Q: Great attorneys! I was honored to work with Gary, he did a phenomenal job. Not only him but the entire team. Communication was excellent, never had a problem reaching out to them and the outcome was good as expected.
A: Thanks Andy, much appreciated!
— Abels & Annes, P.C.
Q: How can a motorcycle accident attorney help with medical bills if I can’t pay now?
A: The attorneys can ask medical providers to file liens so those bills are paid from the settlement, and make sure your insurance is used appropriately.
— Abels & Annes, P.C.
Q: What if I was partly at fault for the accident?
A: Illinois uses modified comparative negligence: if you are less than 51% at fault you may recover damages, but your award is reduced by your percentage of fault.
— Abels & Annes, P.C.
Q: How long does it take to settle a personal injury case?
A: It depends on the injuries, how clear fault is, and whether the case settles or goes to court. Some resolve in months, others take longer.
— Abels & Annes, P.C.
Q: How much is a car accident case worth?
A: The value of a car-accident claim in Chicago will vary widely, and you’d need to assess all the specific details of your case to estimate it.
— Abels & Annes, P.C.