Direct answer · depth-50 consumer intelligence

Compare Car Accident law firms in Portland, OR

Law Offices of Jon Friedman (86.7/100), Johnston Law Firm (84.3/100), Bridge City Law | Accident & Injury Lawyers (83.7/100) have the three highest Review Evidence Scores among 23 qualified offices in Law Leaderboard’s fixed Portland car accident cohort. The score compares public-review evidence; it does not measure legal ability, credentials, outcomes, or fit.

23qualified offices
3,809review texts analyzed
74.6median evidence score
46%of discovered offices qualified

Release 2026.08.12-r4 · fixed cohort · published 2026-08-12 · minimum publication gate: 8 qualified offices

Fast comparison

Top five by Review Evidence Score

Open side-by-side comparison →
Top five Portland car accident offices by Review Evidence Score
Rank / officeScoreRatingTracked reviewsTexts analyzedPractice evidenceMaps visibility
#1Law Offices of Jon Friedman 86.7 5 159 154 Published practice evidence #1
#2Johnston Law Firm 84.3 5 147 134 Published practice evidence #2
#3Bridge City Law | Accident & Injury Lawyers 83.7 4.9 232 215 Published practice evidence #9
#4Levin and Levine, LLP 83.7 5 121 117 Published practice evidence #55
#5Elzinga & Associates LLC 80.3 5 138 132 Published practice evidence #25

Maps visibility is shown separately and is never used to calculate the Review Evidence Score.

Leading office profiles

Each profile combines score depth, practice-signal basis, and a separate visibility observation. Read the office page before making a shortlist.

#2 in this cohort

Johnston Law Firm

84.3score
Rating
5/5
Analyzed
134
Maps
#2

Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: moderate. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.

Review full office evidence →

#9 in this cohort

Ross Law PDX

76.8score
Rating
4.9/5
Analyzed
59
Maps
#40

Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: minimum. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.

Review full office evidence →

#10 in this cohort

Lowe Law Group

76.7score
Rating
4.9/5
Analyzed
157
Maps
#43

Practice basis: Profile + review context. Evidence depth: moderate. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.

Review full office evidence →

What this market reveals

Market depth

Evidence beyond the first 20 results

12 qualified offices were observed beyond Maps position 20, while 11 were observed within the first 20. Discovery visibility and review evidence can tell different stories.

Review concentration

Top five hold 17.2%

The five most-reviewed qualified offices account for 17.2% of tracked reviews. The review-volume HHI is 1666.4, a descriptive concentration measure rather than a quality score.

How practice and review evidence differ

For car-accident comparisons, the practice-evidence gate connects each included profile to public practice language or enough context-classified review evidence. This supports comparison within the listed market using a consistent evidence threshold. It does not prove specialization, qualifications, case experience, expected outcomes, or suitability for an individual situation.

The practice gate decides whether an office belongs in this comparison. The Review Evidence Score then compares public-rating, depth, recommendation, communication, public owner-response, consistency, and low-concern signals. Neither step evaluates legal skill or likely results.

Maps visibility stays separate

“Best observed position” is the strongest discovery position captured across the fixed query collection. Multiple offices can show the same value when observations came from different queries or backfills. It is never a score input.

Read the complete methodology →

Complete published cohort

All 23 qualified offices

Explore this market’s data →
All qualified Portland car accident offices in Review Evidence Score order
RankOfficeScoreRatingTrackedAnalyzedEvidenceMaps
#1Law Offices of Jon Friedman86.75159154moderate#1
#2Johnston Law Firm84.35147134moderate#2
#3Bridge City Law | Accident & Injury Lawyers83.74.9232215moderate#9
#4Levin and Levine, LLP83.75121117moderate#55
#5Elzinga & Associates LLC80.35138132moderate#25
#6Law Office of Chad Stavley79.259589minimum#34
#7Thomas, Coon, Newton & Frost76.84.9177165moderate#28
#8Dawson Law Group: Car Accident & Injury Lawyers76.859993minimum#11
#9Ross Law PDX76.84.96159minimum#40
#10Lowe Law Group76.74.9185157moderate#43
#11Sheldon Aronson75.258484minimum#50
#12ELG Injury Lawyers - Portland74.64.98775minimum#12
#13Rosenbaum Law Group73.94.95350minimum#20
#14Tillmann Law | Car Accident and Personal Injury Lawyers72.44.88772minimum#3
#15DuBois Law Group - PDX Injury Law71.94.86360minimum#27
#16Mayor Law: Car Accident & Wrongful Death Lawyer71.84.98179minimum#16
#17Yunus Muhammad PC714.811898minimum#48
#18Sears Injury Law69.94.813863minimum#22
#19D'Amore Law Group67.34.95755minimum#4
#20Pickett Dummigan Weingart LLP66.54.88776minimum#35
#21The Advocates Injury Attorneys65.74.9131100moderate#8
#22Moseley Collins Law64.851,7341,251extensive#31
#23Goldberg & Loren60.94.6495431strong#18

Questions about this comparison

Which Portland car accident firms lead this review-evidence comparison?

Law Offices of Jon Friedman (86.7/100), Johnston Law Firm (84.3/100), Bridge City Law | Accident & Injury Lawyers (83.7/100) have the three highest Review Evidence Scores among 23 qualified offices in Law Leaderboard’s fixed Portland car accident cohort. The score compares public-review evidence; it does not measure legal ability, credentials, outcomes, or fit.

How many Portland offices qualified for this comparison?

23 of 50 discovered office profiles passed both the review-evidence and practice-signal gates. Law Leaderboard requires at least 8 qualified offices before publishing a market page.

Does Google Maps position affect the Law Leaderboard score?

No. Maps visibility is reported as a separate discovery observation and never enters the Review Evidence Score.

Does appearing here prove that a firm specializes in car accident matters?

No. Practice inclusion requires explicit public-profile language or sufficient context-classified review evidence. It is not a credential, specialization certification, endorsement, or outcome claim.

Sources, freshness, and limitations

Source research release llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1 was materialized 2026-08-12T08:00:43Z. Practice classification uses practice-signal-v1.0.0; scoring uses review-evidence-v1.0.0. The public consumer release was published 2026-08-12.

  • The fixed discovery cohort is not a census of every law office in the market.
  • Google Maps discovery positions are captured observations, may repeat across queries, and are not scoring inputs.
  • Public reviews are incomplete, can change, and do not establish legal skill or predict a case outcome.
  • Practice evidence reflects explicit public-profile language or classified review context; it is not a credential or specialization finding.

More Car Accident markets

View every published car accident market →