Direct answer
Published 2026-08-12 · Release 2026.08.12-r4
Law Offices of Jon Friedman (86.7/100), Johnston Law Firm (84.3/100), Bridge City Law | Accident & Injury Lawyers (83.7/100) have the three highest Review Evidence Scores among 23 qualified offices in Law Leaderboard’s fixed Portland car accident cohort. The score compares public-review evidence; it does not measure legal ability, credentials, outcomes, or fit.
Fixed cohort · minimum publication gate: 8 qualified offices
Fast comparison
| Rank / office | Score | Rating | Tracked | Analyzed | Practice evidence | Maps pos. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1Law Offices of Jon Friedman | 86.7 | 5 | 159 | 154 | Published practice evidence | #1 |
| #2Johnston Law Firm | 84.3 | 5 | 147 | 134 | Published practice evidence | #2 |
| #3Bridge City Law | Accident & Injury Lawyers | 83.7 | 4.9 | 232 | 215 | Published practice evidence | #9 |
| #4Levin and Levine, LLP | 83.7 | 5 | 121 | 117 | Published practice evidence | #55 |
| #5Elzinga & Associates LLC | 80.3 | 5 | 138 | 132 | Published practice evidence | #25 |
Maps visibility is shown separately and is never used to calculate the Review Evidence Score.
Leading offices
Each profile combines score depth, practice-signal basis, and a separate visibility observation. Read the office page before making a shortlist.
Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: moderate. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: moderate. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: moderate. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: moderate. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: moderate. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: minimum. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: moderate. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Practice basis: Profile + review context. Evidence depth: minimum. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: minimum. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Practice basis: Profile + review context. Evidence depth: moderate. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Market insights
Market depth
12 qualified offices were observed beyond Maps position 20, while 11 were observed within the first 20. Discovery visibility and review evidence can tell different stories.
12 of 23 beyond position 20
Hidden leaders
A “hidden leader” appears beyond observed Maps position 20 but has a Review Evidence Score at or above the qualified-market median. It is a research label, not an endorsement.
Levin and Levine, LLP: 83.7 score, Maps #55Elzinga & Associates LLC: 80.3 score, Maps #25Law Office of Chad Stavley: 79.2 score, Maps #34Review concentration
The five most-reviewed qualified offices account for 17.2% of tracked reviews. The review-volume HHI is 1666.4, a descriptive concentration measure rather than a quality score.
HHI 1666.4
For car-accident comparisons, the practice-evidence gate connects each included profile to public practice language or enough context-classified review evidence. This supports comparison within the listed market using a consistent evidence threshold. It does not prove specialization, qualifications, case experience, expected outcomes, or suitability for an individual situation.
The practice gate decides whether an office belongs in this comparison. The Review Evidence Score then compares public-rating, depth, recommendation, communication, public owner-response, consistency, and low-concern signals. Neither step evaluates legal skill or likely results.
“Best observed position” is the strongest discovery position captured across the fixed query collection. Multiple offices can show the same value when observations came from different queries or backfills. It is never a score input.
Read the complete methodology →Complete published cohort
| Rank | Office | Score | Rating | Tracked | Analyzed | Evidence | Maps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Law Offices of Jon Friedman | 86.7 | 5 | 159 | 154 | moderate | #1 |
| #2 | Johnston Law Firm | 84.3 | 5 | 147 | 134 | moderate | #2 |
| #3 | Bridge City Law | Accident & Injury Lawyers | 83.7 | 4.9 | 232 | 215 | moderate | #9 |
| #4 | Levin and Levine, LLP | 83.7 | 5 | 121 | 117 | moderate | #55 |
| #5 | Elzinga & Associates LLC | 80.3 | 5 | 138 | 132 | moderate | #25 |
| #6 | Law Office of Chad Stavley | 79.2 | 5 | 95 | 89 | minimum | #34 |
| #7 | Thomas, Coon, Newton & Frost | 76.8 | 4.9 | 177 | 165 | moderate | #28 |
| #8 | Dawson Law Group: Car Accident & Injury Lawyers | 76.8 | 5 | 99 | 93 | minimum | #11 |
| #9 | Ross Law PDX | 76.8 | 4.9 | 61 | 59 | minimum | #40 |
| #10 | Lowe Law Group | 76.7 | 4.9 | 185 | 157 | moderate | #43 |
| #11 | Sheldon Aronson | 75.2 | 5 | 84 | 84 | minimum | #50 |
| #12 | ELG Injury Lawyers - Portland | 74.6 | 4.9 | 87 | 75 | minimum | #12 |
| #13 | Rosenbaum Law Group | 73.9 | 4.9 | 53 | 50 | minimum | #20 |
| #14 | Tillmann Law | Car Accident and Personal Injury Lawyers | 72.4 | 4.8 | 87 | 72 | minimum | #3 |
| #15 | DuBois Law Group - PDX Injury Law | 71.9 | 4.8 | 63 | 60 | minimum | #27 |
| #16 | Mayor Law: Car Accident & Wrongful Death Lawyer | 71.8 | 4.9 | 81 | 79 | minimum | #16 |
| #17 | Yunus Muhammad PC | 71 | 4.8 | 118 | 98 | minimum | #48 |
| #18 | Sears Injury Law | 69.9 | 4.8 | 138 | 63 | minimum | #22 |
| #19 | D'Amore Law Group | 67.3 | 4.9 | 57 | 55 | minimum | #4 |
| #20 | Pickett Dummigan Weingart LLP | 66.5 | 4.8 | 87 | 76 | minimum | #35 |
| #21 | The Advocates Injury Attorneys | 65.7 | 4.9 | 131 | 100 | moderate | #8 |
| #22 | Moseley Collins Law | 64.8 | 5 | 1,734 | 1,251 | extensive | #31 |
| #23 | Goldberg & Loren | 60.9 | 4.6 | 495 | 431 | strong | #18 |
Rank movement between snapshots is withheld until the multi-snapshot publication gate is met, so this table reports one dated snapshot rather than a trend. Scores compare public-review evidence only.
FAQ
Each answer is self-contained and mirrors this page's FAQ structured data.
Law Offices of Jon Friedman (86.7/100), Johnston Law Firm (84.3/100), Bridge City Law | Accident & Injury Lawyers (83.7/100) have the three highest Review Evidence Scores among 23 qualified offices in Law Leaderboard’s fixed Portland car accident cohort. The score compares public-review evidence; it does not measure legal ability, credentials, outcomes, or fit.
23 of 50 discovered office profiles passed both the review-evidence and practice-signal gates. Law Leaderboard requires at least 8 qualified offices before publishing a market page.
No. Maps visibility is reported as a separate discovery observation and never enters the Review Evidence Score.
No. Practice inclusion requires explicit public-profile language or sufficient context-classified review evidence. It is not a credential, specialization certification, endorsement, or outcome claim.
Provenance
Source research release llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1 was materialized 2026-08-12T08:00:43Z. Practice classification uses practice-signal-v1.0.0; scoring uses review-evidence-v1.0.0. The public consumer release was published 2026-08-12.
Keep comparing