6500 S Macadam Ave Ste 380, Portland, OR 97239
Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.
Goldberg & Loren is a personal injury attorney in Portland, Oregon with a 4.6-star rating across 495 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 508 reviews for this profile and analyzed 431 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 18% of retrieved reviews, 57% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 27% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 80.
The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (57%), case results (47%), and professionalism (32%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, motorcycle, and slip and fall. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (57%), case results (47%), and professionalism (32%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Goldberg & Loren at 6500 S Macadam Ave Ste 380, Portland, OR 97239. The listing has 495 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Goldberg & Loren has a 4.6/5 public Google rating across 495 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 508 reviews and analyzed 431 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 18% of retrieved reviews, 57% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 27% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are poor communication (12%), unprofessional (12%), and passed around (7%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Public review data shows an owner reply on 18% of the reviews retrieved for Goldberg & Loren. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 27% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 60.9/100 | Strong evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 8.7th percentile | Compared with the fixed Portland, OR cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 495 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 508 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 431 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 18% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 57% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 27% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Consistency index | 80 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
60.9/100
Score percentile
8.7th percentile
Rating percentile
4.3th percentile
Review-count percentile
95.7th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
Not scored
Strong evidence from 431 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
12.1%
52 matches: 47 positive, 0 negative, 5 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.
7.2%
31 matches: 24 positive, 7 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
3.5%
15 matches: 12 positive, 3 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Jan 13, 2021
Latest dated review
Aug 1, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
495 retrieved of 495 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
122
Average rating: 4.51/5
Average rating
-0.05 stars
4.51/5 in the recent period vs. 4.56/5 in the prior period
Review activity
-31 reviews
122 recent reviews vs. 153 in the prior period
Replies to 1–3-star reviews
54%
25 replies across 46 retrieved low-star reviews
Replies to 4–5-star reviews
18%
81 replies across 449 retrieved high-star reviews
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
At Goldberg & Loren, located at 6500 S Macadam Ave Suite 380, we are dedicated to providing exceptional legal representation for individuals seeking justice in personal injury cases. As leading person...
Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Based on analysis of 431 text reviews in the current build.
Q: How long does it take to get a settlement?
A: The time to get a personal injury settlement varies widely based on case complexity, injury severity, and negotiation processes. Minor injury cases might settle within a couple of months to a year, while severe or disputed cases can take several years. Insurance companies aim to settle quickly, ...
— Goldberg & Loren
Q: How Is Pain and Suffering Calculated?
A: Pain and suffering in personal injury cases are calculated using two main methods: .1 The multiplier method and the per diem method. The multiplier method involves adding up all economic damages (like medical bills and lost wages) and multiplying them by a number between 1.5 and 5, depending on th...
— Goldberg & Loren
Q: What Damages Can I Recover?
A: If you've been involved in a car accident, you might be entitled to recover various types of damages depending on the specifics of your case. Here's an overview of potential damages you could seek: medical experiences, lost wages, property damage, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, punit...
— Goldberg & Loren
Q: Why Do I Need a Personal Injury Attorney?
A: Victims frequently ask about the necessity of hiring an attorney, especially to navigate insurance claims, evaluate injuries, and handle legal complexities.
— Goldberg & Loren