Sears Injury Law Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

7931 NE Halsey St #210, Portland, OR 97213

4.9
131 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Sears Injury Law is a personal injury attorney in Portland, Oregon with a 4.9-star rating across 131 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 131 reviews for this profile and analyzed 56 text reviews. The firm replies to 100% of public reviews, 46% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 16% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 96.4.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (46%), communication (16%), and professionalism (14%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews131Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved131Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed56Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate100%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate46%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions16%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index96.4Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmedical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2.3
Avg Review Length
162 chars
Local Guide %
20%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal servicesTrial attorney

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 56 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
100%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
46%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
16%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
14%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
9%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 248.2 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
119 (91%)
4 star
8 (6.1%)
3 star
4 (3.1%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
100% positive reviews Consistency index: 96.4

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 46.4% of reviews
communication 16.1% of reviews
professionalism 14.3% of reviews
dedication 12.5% of reviews
transparency 10.7% of reviews

Recent Reviews

marcos medina Local Guide
a week ago
Sarah Brink

John and the team were amazing. They respect you, they listen to you. And they help you and they go above and beyond. So thank you, John, I'm giving you a shout out for being a wonderful person, and I thank you for everything that you did in my behalf. I wish all you guys the best. I'm thank you for...

a week ago
Xiaobai Yu Local Guide

James was really kind and helpful collecting information, answering questions and walking me through the process. I appreciate that.

a week ago
Salahadin Ali
a week ago
Eufemia Ojeda
2 weeks ago

Other Personal Injury in Portland

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 131 retrieved reviews and 56 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 14:27:20.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 14:27:20.
  • 131 total Google reviews tracked; 131 reviews retrieved; 56 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 14:27:20, reviews: 2026-04-02 14:30:19, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:28.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Portland personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews