Disparti Law Group Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

121 W Wacker Dr Ste 2300, Chicago, IL 60601

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.7
3,397 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Disparti Law Group is a personal injury attorney in Chicago, Illinois with a 4.7-star rating across 3,397 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 3,397 reviews for this profile and analyzed 1,706 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 96% of retrieved reviews, 23% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 10% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 79.5.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (23%), professionalism (16%), and case results (15%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Disparti Law Group Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (23%), professionalism (16%), and case results (15%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Disparti Law Group legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Disparti Law Group at 121 W Wacker Dr Ste 2300, Chicago, IL 60601. The listing has 3,397 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Disparti Law Group a good law firm?

Disparti Law Group has a 4.7/5 public Google rating across 3,397 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 3,397 reviews and analyzed 1,706 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 96% of retrieved reviews, 23% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 10% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Disparti Law Group reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (19%), poor communication (4%), and slow process (2%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Disparti Law Group respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 96% of the reviews retrieved for Disparti Law Group. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 10% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score59.3/100Extensive evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile21.7th percentileCompared with the fixed Chicago, IL cohort.
Tracked Google reviews3,397Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved3,397Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed1,706Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate96%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate23%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions10%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index79.5Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Chicago, IL

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

59.3/100

Score percentile

21.7th percentile

Rating percentile

21.7th percentile

Review-count percentile

95.7th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Extensive evidence from 1,706 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-46f71cb4500087de
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-15060c3e02a284c8
Brand relationship
Disparti Law Group

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcyclemedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
14.8
Avg Review Length
160 chars
Local Guide %
19%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal services

About

About Disparti Law Group, P.A. Larry Disparti, and the attorneys at the Disparti Law Group know how to win! With more than One Billion in Recoveries our team is among the best reviewed Law Firms in t...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 1,706 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
96%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
23%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
10%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
16%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
15%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
3%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 162.8 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
3055 (90%)
4 star
126 (3.7%)
3 star
35 (1%)
2 star
30 (<1%)
1 star
151 (4.4%)
90% positive reviews 9% negative reviews Consistency index: 79.5

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 23.3% of reviews
professionalism 15.6% of reviews
case results 14.5% of reviews
communication 9.7% of reviews
speed 6.6% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (19.3%)
poor communication (3.6%)
slow process (1.8%)

Other Medical Malpractice in Chicago

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 3,397 retrieved reviews and 1,706 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:02Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:54:48Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:56.
  • 3,397 total Google reviews tracked; 3,397 reviews retrieved; 1,706 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Chicago medical malpractice lawyers ranked by public review signals
Compare this office in the Truck Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Workers' Compensation cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →