DeBrun & Armstrong Law Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

1512 E 4th St, Charlotte, NC 28204

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.9
181 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

DeBrun & Armstrong Law is a personal injury attorney in Charlotte, North Carolina with a 4.9-star rating across 181 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 181 reviews for this profile and analyzed 143 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 69% of retrieved reviews, 69% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 25% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 99.3.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (69%), professionalism (33%), and communication (25%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

DeBrun & Armstrong Law Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (69%), professionalism (33%), and communication (25%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is DeBrun & Armstrong Law legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for DeBrun & Armstrong Law at 1512 E 4th St, Charlotte, NC 28204. The listing has 181 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is DeBrun & Armstrong Law a good law firm?

DeBrun & Armstrong Law has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 181 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 181 reviews and analyzed 143 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 69% of retrieved reviews, 69% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 25% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do DeBrun & Armstrong Law reviews complain about?

The current analyzed sample does not contain a recurring complaint category for DeBrun & Armstrong Law. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does DeBrun & Armstrong Law respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 69% of the reviews retrieved for DeBrun & Armstrong Law. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 25% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score77.3/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile75th percentileCompared with the fixed Charlotte, NC cohort.
Tracked Google reviews181Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved181Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed143Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate69%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate69%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions25%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index99.3Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Charlotte, NC

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

77.3/100

Score percentile

75th percentile

Rating percentile

83.3th percentile

Review-count percentile

33.3th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 143 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-c4b1d3efd4b98e79
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-e1c53df0ba520049
Brand relationship
DeBrun & Armstrong Law

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentworkplace injury

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
1.3
Avg Review Length
263 chars
Local Guide %
24%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyTrial attorney

About

Debrun & Armstrong Law is a personal injury law firm serving the Charlotte, NC area. Our personal injury lawyers and attorneys are experts at cases involving car accidents, truck accidents, wrongful d...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 143 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
69%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
69%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
25%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
33%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
18%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
11%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 96.2 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
175 (97%)
4 star
3 (1.7%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
2 (1.1%)
100% positive reviews Consistency index: 99.3

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 68.5% of reviews
professionalism 32.9% of reviews
communication 25.2% of reviews
case results 18.2% of reviews
dedication 14.7% of reviews

Other truck-accident in Charlotte

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 181 retrieved reviews and 143 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:15Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:29:06Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:10:00.
  • 181 total Google reviews tracked; 181 reviews retrieved; 143 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Charlotte truck-accident lawyers ranked by public review signals
Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →