428 E 4th St #101, Charlotte, NC 28202
Review evidence score
Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.
Anastopoulo Law Firm is a personal injury attorney in Charlotte, North Carolina with a 4.8-star rating across 398 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 398 reviews for this profile and analyzed 318 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 94% of retrieved reviews, 8% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 2% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 89.
The most common review themes are professionalism (20%), explicit recommendation (8%), and compassion and care (6%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
Anastopoulo Law Firm reviews most often praise professionalism (20%), explicit recommendation (8%), and compassion and care (6%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Anastopoulo Law Firm is listed on Google as a public business profile at 428 E 4th St #101, Charlotte, NC 28202, with 398 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Anastopoulo Law Firm has a 4.8/5 public Google rating across 398 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 398 reviews and analyzed 318 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 94% of retrieved reviews, 8% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 2% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
Anastopoulo Law Firm reviews in the analyzed negative sample carry the recurring concern labels unprofessional (19%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Anastopoulo Law Firm has replied to 94% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 2% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 58.3/100 | Strong evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 18.9th percentile | Compared with the fixed Charlotte, NC cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 398 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 398 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 318 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 94% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 8% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 2% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Professionalism mentions | 20% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism. |
| Case-results mentions | 3% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results. |
| Compassion mentions | 6% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care. |
| Consistency index | 89 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
| Average owner response time | 71.9 days | Mean delay between a public review and the owner reply. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
58.3/100
Score percentile
18.9th percentile
Rating percentile
27th percentile
Review-count percentile
75.7th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
Not scored
Strong evidence from 318 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
1.3%
4 matches: 4 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 3, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Nov 4, 2021
Latest dated review
Jul 7, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
398 retrieved of 398 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
275
Average rating: 4.91/5
The retrieved history does not yet meet the full-window coverage and rating-count gate for a fair twelve-month comparison.
Replies to 1–3-star reviews
52%
11 replies across 21 retrieved low-star reviews
Replies to 4–5-star reviews
94%
355 replies across 377 retrieved high-star reviews
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
For more than 25 years, the Anastopoulo Law Firm has been helping injured clients throughout the Carolina's. The firm provides zealous legal representation for a variety of personal injury, wrongful d...
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Provenance