Price Petho & Associates Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

1430 Elizabeth Ave, Charlotte, NC 28204

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

4.9
641 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Price Petho & Associates is a personal injury attorney in Charlotte, North Carolina with a 4.9-star rating across 641 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 646 reviews for this profile and analyzed 505 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 92% of retrieved reviews, 59% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 15% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 96.8.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (59%), professionalism (22%), and case results (16%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Price Petho & Associates Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (59%), professionalism (22%), and case results (16%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Price Petho & Associates legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Price Petho & Associates at 1430 Elizabeth Ave, Charlotte, NC 28204. The listing has 641 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Price Petho & Associates a good law firm?

Price Petho & Associates has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 641 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 646 reviews and analyzed 505 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 92% of retrieved reviews, 59% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 15% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Price Petho & Associates reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (50%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Price Petho & Associates respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 92% of the reviews retrieved for Price Petho & Associates. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 15% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score76.2/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile64.9th percentileCompared with the fixed Charlotte, NC cohort.
Tracked Google reviews641Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved646Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed505Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate92%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate59%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions15%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index96.8Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Charlotte, NC

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

76.2/100

Score percentile

64.9th percentile

Rating percentile

67.6th percentile

Review-count percentile

86.5th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 505 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-c4e4f0f11222879c
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-a8ae8b8a776c6e1d
Brand relationship
Price Petho & Associates

Nearby evidence comparisons

The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

4.8%

24 matches: 23 positive, 1 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

4.6%

23 matches: 21 positive, 0 negative, 2 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

2.0%

10 matches: 10 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Nov 17, 2015

Latest dated review

Jul 22, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

641 retrieved of 641 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

78

Average rating: 4.88/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.09 stars

4.88/5 in the recent period vs. 4.79/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-21 reviews

78 recent reviews vs. 99 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

79%

11 replies across 14 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

90%

562 replies across 627 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcyclemedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
4.4
Avg Review Length
206 chars
Local Guide %
17%

Practice Areas

Elder law attorneyInsurance attorneyLaw firmAttorneyLegal servicesMedical lawyer

About

Since 1979, Price, Petho & Associates is a team of experienced personal injury lawyers in Charlotte, NC, who will fight for our clients. License to practice in both North and South Carolina, our perso...

Source-Backed Website Signals

Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.

Intake And Fee Signals

Free consultation stated 24/7 availability stated Contact form observed Phone intake observed

Languages And Practice Signals

Languages
French Spanish
Practice Areas Mentioned On Site
bicycle accident brain injury car accident dog bite medical malpractice motorcycle accident pedestrian accident product liability slip and fall truck accident workers compensation wrongful death

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 505 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
92%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
59%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
15%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
22%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
16%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 160.4 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
619 (97%)
4 star
8 (1.2%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
4 (<1%)
1 star
9 (1.4%)
98% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 96.8

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 59.4% of reviews
professionalism 22.4% of reviews
case results 15.8% of reviews
communication 15.2% of reviews
speed 7.9% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (50%)

Questions & Answers

Q: Hello I want to know if you speak spanish..thank you

A: Yes. Both Attorney and staff are bilingual

— Price Petho & Associates

Other Personal Injury in Charlotte

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 646 retrieved reviews and 505 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • 3 captured pages from the firm's website support the displayed self-reported intake signals, languages, and practice-area mentions.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 13:16:42.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:11; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:24.
  • 641 total Google reviews tracked; 646 reviews retrieved; 505 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Charlotte personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore North Carolina personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Motorcycle Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Truck Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Workers' Compensation cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →