#1 in this cohort
Torgenson Law
88.4score
- Rating
- 5/5
- Analyzed
- 636
- Maps
- #6
Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: strong. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →Direct answer · depth-50 consumer intelligence
Compare Truck Accident law firms in Phoenix, AZ
Torgenson Law (88.4/100), Kelly Law Team Phoenix (84.1/100), Shapiro Law Team (79.8/100) have the three highest Review Evidence Scores among 19 qualified offices in Law Leaderboard’s fixed Phoenix truck accident cohort. The score compares public-review evidence; it does not measure legal ability, credentials, outcomes, or fit.
19qualified offices
9,069review texts analyzed
69.6median evidence score
38%of discovered offices qualified
Release 2026.08.12-r4 · fixed cohort · published 2026-08-12 · minimum publication gate: 8 qualified offices
Fast comparison
Top five by Review Evidence Score
| Rank / office | Score | Rating | Tracked reviews | Texts analyzed | Practice evidence | Maps visibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1Torgenson Law | 88.4 | 5 | 720 | 636 | Published practice evidence | #6 |
| #2Kelly Law Team Phoenix | 84.1 | 5 | 334 | 319 | Published practice evidence | #2 |
| #3Shapiro Law Team | 79.8 | 5 | 875 | 789 | Published practice evidence | #43 |
| #4Runion Personal Injury Lawyers - Phoenix Office | 78.7 | 4.9 | 197 | 180 | Explicit public profile | #20 |
| #5Sargon Law Group | 77.9 | 4.9 | 422 | 385 | Explicit public profile | #32 |
Maps visibility is shown separately and is never used to calculate the Review Evidence Score.
Leading office profiles
Each profile combines score depth, practice-signal basis, and a separate visibility observation. Read the office page before making a shortlist.
#2 in this cohort
Kelly Law Team Phoenix
84.1score
- Rating
- 5/5
- Analyzed
- 319
- Maps
- #2
Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: strong. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →#3 in this cohort
Shapiro Law Team
79.8score
- Rating
- 5/5
- Analyzed
- 789
- Maps
- #43
Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: strong. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →#4 in this cohort
Runion Personal Injury Lawyers - Phoenix Office
78.7score
- Rating
- 4.9/5
- Analyzed
- 180
- Maps
- #20
Practice basis: Explicit public profile. Evidence depth: moderate. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →#5 in this cohort
Sargon Law Group
77.9score
- Rating
- 4.9/5
- Analyzed
- 385
- Maps
- #32
Practice basis: Explicit public profile. Evidence depth: strong. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →#6 in this cohort
Rack Law Accident Lawyers Phoenix
74.3score
- Rating
- 4.9/5
- Analyzed
- 461
- Maps
- #19
Practice basis: Profile + review context. Evidence depth: strong. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →#7 in this cohort
Blake Law Firm
73.4score
- Rating
- 4.9/5
- Analyzed
- 282
- Maps
- #48
Practice basis: Explicit public profile. Evidence depth: strong. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →#8 in this cohort
Lloyd Baker Injury Attorneys
71.7score
- Rating
- 4.9/5
- Analyzed
- 504
- Maps
- #18
Practice basis: Published practice evidence. Evidence depth: strong. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →#9 in this cohort
Solorzano Law Firm
71.7score
- Rating
- 5/5
- Analyzed
- 496
- Maps
- #24
Practice basis: Explicit public profile. Evidence depth: strong. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →#10 in this cohort
Big Chad Law Injury & Accident Lawyers
69.6score
- Rating
- 4.9/5
- Analyzed
- 422
- Maps
- #9
Practice basis: Explicit public profile. Evidence depth: strong. These are observed public signals, not a specialization or outcome finding.
Review full office evidence →What this market reveals
Market depth
Evidence beyond the first 20 results
9 qualified offices were observed beyond Maps position 20, while 10 were observed within the first 20. Discovery visibility and review evidence can tell different stories.
Hidden leaders
4 offices meet the defined signal
A “hidden leader” appears beyond observed Maps position 20 but has a Review Evidence Score at or above the qualified-market median. It is a research label, not an endorsement.
Shapiro Law Team: 79.8 score, Maps #43Sargon Law Group: 77.9 score, Maps #32Blake Law Firm: 73.4 score, Maps #48Review concentration
Top five hold 22.5%
The five most-reviewed qualified offices account for 22.5% of tracked reviews. The review-volume HHI is 938.3, a descriptive concentration measure rather than a quality score.
How practice and review evidence differ
For truck-accident comparisons, inclusion requires the review input gate plus an explicit public-profile practice signal or sufficient context-classified review evidence. The gate helps keep the comparison tied to public evidence for this practice label. It does not demonstrate specialization, credentials, legal skill, case results, or fit for a reader’s needs.
The practice gate decides whether an office belongs in this comparison. The Review Evidence Score then compares public-rating, depth, recommendation, communication, public owner-response, consistency, and low-concern signals. Neither step evaluates legal skill or likely results.
Maps visibility stays separate
“Best observed position” is the strongest discovery position captured across the fixed query collection. Multiple offices can show the same value when observations came from different queries or backfills. It is never a score input.
Read the complete methodology →Complete published cohort
All 19 qualified offices
| Rank | Office | Score | Rating | Tracked | Analyzed | Evidence | Maps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Torgenson Law | 88.4 | 5 | 720 | 636 | strong | #6 |
| #2 | Kelly Law Team Phoenix | 84.1 | 5 | 334 | 319 | strong | #2 |
| #3 | Shapiro Law Team | 79.8 | 5 | 875 | 789 | strong | #43 |
| #4 | Runion Personal Injury Lawyers - Phoenix Office | 78.7 | 4.9 | 197 | 180 | moderate | #20 |
| #5 | Sargon Law Group | 77.9 | 4.9 | 422 | 385 | strong | #32 |
| #6 | Rack Law Accident Lawyers Phoenix | 74.3 | 4.9 | 531 | 461 | strong | #19 |
| #7 | Blake Law Firm | 73.4 | 4.9 | 359 | 282 | strong | #48 |
| #8 | Lloyd Baker Injury Attorneys | 71.7 | 4.9 | 849 | 504 | strong | #18 |
| #9 | Solorzano Law Firm | 71.7 | 5 | 838 | 496 | strong | #24 |
| #10 | Big Chad Law Injury & Accident Lawyers | 69.6 | 4.9 | 622 | 422 | strong | #9 |
| #11 | Big Auto Accident Attorneys | 68 | 4.9 | 669 | 589 | strong | #10 |
| #12 | AJ Law - Accident Justice | 67.9 | 4.9 | 142 | 117 | moderate | #36 |
| #13 | Feller & Wendt, LLC | 67.9 | 4.8 | 123 | 83 | minimum | #3 |
| #14 | Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys | 67.4 | 4.7 | 1,005 | 811 | strong | #37 |
| #15 | The Husband & Wife Law Team | 67 | 4.7 | 272 | 231 | moderate | #28 |
| #16 | Phillips Law Group - Injury Lawyers | 66.6 | 4.8 | 2,511 | 2,143 | extensive | #21 |
| #17 | Law Offices of Samuel P. Moeller, PLLC | 61.5 | 4.5 | 104 | 90 | minimum | #50 |
| #18 | McCormick Law, Car Wreck Attorneys PLLC | 60 | 4.8 | 471 | 373 | strong | #4 |
| #19 | TopDog Law Personal Injury Lawyers | 59.8 | 4.7 | 270 | 158 | moderate | #17 |
Questions about this comparison
Which Phoenix truck accident firms lead this review-evidence comparison?
Torgenson Law (88.4/100), Kelly Law Team Phoenix (84.1/100), Shapiro Law Team (79.8/100) have the three highest Review Evidence Scores among 19 qualified offices in Law Leaderboard’s fixed Phoenix truck accident cohort. The score compares public-review evidence; it does not measure legal ability, credentials, outcomes, or fit.
How many Phoenix offices qualified for this comparison?
19 of 50 discovered office profiles passed both the review-evidence and practice-signal gates. Law Leaderboard requires at least 8 qualified offices before publishing a market page.
Does Google Maps position affect the Law Leaderboard score?
No. Maps visibility is reported as a separate discovery observation and never enters the Review Evidence Score.
Does appearing here prove that a firm specializes in truck accident matters?
No. Practice inclusion requires explicit public-profile language or sufficient context-classified review evidence. It is not a credential, specialization certification, endorsement, or outcome claim.
Sources, freshness, and limitations
Source research release llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1 was materialized 2026-08-12T08:00:43Z. Practice classification uses practice-signal-v1.0.0; scoring uses review-evidence-v1.0.0. The public consumer release was published 2026-08-12.
- The fixed discovery cohort is not a census of every law office in the market.
- Google Maps discovery positions are captured observations, may repeat across queries, and are not scoring inputs.
- Public reviews are incomplete, can change, and do not establish legal skill or predict a case outcome.
- Practice evidence reflects explicit public-profile language or classified review context; it is not a credential or specialization finding.
More Truck Accident markets
Atlanta, GA 26 qualifiedAustin, TX 21 qualifiedCharlotte, NC 12 qualifiedChicago, IL 18 qualifiedDallas, TX 20 qualifiedDenver, CO 19 qualifiedHouston, TX 30 qualifiedJacksonville, FL 10 qualifiedLas Vegas, NV 14 qualifiedLos Angeles, CA 15 qualifiedMiami, FL 12 qualifiedMinneapolis, MN 10 qualified
View every published truck accident market →