Big Auto Accident Attorneys Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

3550 N Central Ave Ste 550, Phoenix, AZ 85012

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

4.9
669 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Big Auto Accident Attorneys is a personal injury attorney in Phoenix, Arizona with a 4.9-star rating across 669 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 674 reviews for this profile and analyzed 589 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 39% of retrieved reviews, 48% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 10% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 97.3.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (48%), professionalism (26%), and expertise (12%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Big Auto Accident Attorneys Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (48%), professionalism (26%), and expertise (12%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Big Auto Accident Attorneys legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Big Auto Accident Attorneys at 3550 N Central Ave Ste 550, Phoenix, AZ 85012. The listing has 669 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Big Auto Accident Attorneys a good law firm?

Big Auto Accident Attorneys has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 669 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 674 reviews and analyzed 589 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 39% of retrieved reviews, 48% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 10% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Big Auto Accident Attorneys reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (20%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Big Auto Accident Attorneys respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 39% of the reviews retrieved for Big Auto Accident Attorneys. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 10% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score68/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile38.2th percentileCompared with the fixed Phoenix, AZ cohort.
Tracked Google reviews669Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved674Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed589Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate39%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate48%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions10%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index97.3Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Phoenix, AZ

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

68/100

Score percentile

38.2th percentile

Rating percentile

73.5th percentile

Review-count percentile

79.4th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 589 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-727b17967be85d65
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-ebd48f191b25aba0
Brand relationship
Big Auto Accident Attorneys

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

4.4%

26 matches: 26 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

responsiveness delays

3.2%

19 matches: 19 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Outcome language (unverified)

1.2%

7 matches: 6 positive, 0 negative, 1 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Jul 12, 2023

Latest dated review

Jul 29, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

669 retrieved of 669 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

277

Average rating: 4.88/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

-0.09 stars

4.88/5 in the recent period vs. 4.97/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-88 reviews

277 recent reviews vs. 365 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

0%

0 replies across 9 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

35%

230 replies across 660 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentslip and fallmedical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
16.3
Avg Review Length
170 chars
Local Guide %
12%

Practice Areas

Law firmTrial attorney

About

Big Auto Accident Attorneys is part of a national team of top-tier auto accident attorneys and truck accident attorneys focused on fighting for you wherever you are. Big Auto and our successful co-cou...

Source-Backed Website Signals

Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.

Intake And Fee Signals

Free consultation stated 24/7 availability stated Text intake mentioned Contact form observed Phone intake observed

Languages And Practice Signals

Languages
No source-backed language list captured yet.
Practice Areas Mentioned On Site
car accident dog bite motorcycle accident truck accident wrongful death

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 589 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
39%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
48%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
10%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
26%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
8%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
10%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 36.7 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
647 (97%)
4 star
13 (1.9%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
1 (<1%)
1 star
7 (1%)
99% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 97.3

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 47.9% of reviews
professionalism 25.6% of reviews
expertise 11.7% of reviews
speed 10.5% of reviews
communication 10.2% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (20%)

Other Personal Injury in Phoenix

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 674 retrieved reviews and 589 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • 1 captured pages from the firm's website support the displayed self-reported intake signals, languages, and practice-area mentions.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 12:08:16.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:11; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:22.
  • 669 total Google reviews tracked; 674 reviews retrieved; 589 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Phoenix personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Arizona personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Truck Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Workers' Compensation cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →