Osterbauer, Harper & Furth Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

404 N 3rd Ave #201, Minneapolis, MN 55401

4.6
169 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Osterbauer, Harper & Furth is a personal injury attorney in Minneapolis, Minnesota with a 4.6-star rating across 169 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 169 reviews for this profile and analyzed 142 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 32% of retrieved reviews, 53% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 14% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 78.2.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (53%), case results (37%), and professionalism (19%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Osterbauer, Harper & Furth Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (53%), case results (37%), and professionalism (19%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Osterbauer, Harper & Furth legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Osterbauer, Harper & Furth at 404 N 3rd Ave #201, Minneapolis, MN 55401. The listing has 169 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Osterbauer, Harper & Furth a good law firm?

Osterbauer, Harper & Furth has a 4.6/5 public Google rating across 169 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 169 reviews and analyzed 142 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 32% of retrieved reviews, 53% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 14% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Osterbauer, Harper & Furth reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are passed around (17%), poor communication (8%), and unprofessional (8%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Osterbauer, Harper & Furth respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 32% of the reviews retrieved for Osterbauer, Harper & Furth. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 14% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews169Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved169Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed142Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate32%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate53%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions14%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index78.2Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 3, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

May 5, 2012

Latest dated review

Jul 28, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

169 retrieved of 169 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

26

Average rating: 5.00/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.43 stars

5.00/5 in the recent period vs. 4.57/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-2 reviews

26 recent reviews vs. 28 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

11%

2 replies across 18 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

33%

49 replies across 151 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidenttruck accidentmedical malpracticeworkplace injury

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.8
Avg Review Length
316 chars
Local Guide %
34%

Practice Areas

Labor relations attorneyLaw firmAttorney

About

Osterbauer Law Firm serves Minnesota with seasoned legal counsel in workers’ compensation, bringing 76 years of combined experience to help injured workers secure wage benefits, medical care, rehabili...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 142 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
32%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
53%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
14%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
19%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
37%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 101.3 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
143 (85%)
4 star
8 (4.7%)
3 star
2 (1.2%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
16 (9.5%)
92% positive reviews 9% negative reviews Consistency index: 78.2

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 52.8% of reviews
case results 36.6% of reviews
professionalism 19% of reviews
communication 14.1% of reviews
expertise 14.1% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

passed around (16.7%)
poor communication (8.3%)
unprofessional (8.3%)

Other Personal Injury in Minneapolis

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 169 retrieved reviews and 142 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 3, 2026.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-03 09:44:12.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-03 09:44:12; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-03 09:45:44.
  • 169 total Google reviews tracked; 169 reviews retrieved; 142 text reviews analyzed.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 3, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 09:57:09 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Minneapolis personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Minnesota personal injury markets → Compare Minneapolis truck accident lawyers with context-verified review evidence → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →