Tamburino Law Group Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

150 S 5th St #1490, Minneapolis, MN 55402

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.6
140 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Tamburino Law Group is a criminal justice attorney in Minneapolis, Minnesota with a 4.6-star rating across 140 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 140 reviews for this profile and analyzed 126 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 33% of retrieved reviews, 67% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 21% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 82.5.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (67%), professionalism (44%), and communication (21%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, wrongful death, and dog bite. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Tamburino Law Group Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (67%), professionalism (44%), and communication (21%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Tamburino Law Group legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Tamburino Law Group at 150 S 5th St #1490, Minneapolis, MN 55402. The listing has 140 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Tamburino Law Group a good law firm?

Tamburino Law Group has a 4.6/5 public Google rating across 140 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 140 reviews and analyzed 126 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 33% of retrieved reviews, 67% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 21% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Tamburino Law Group reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (90%) and passed around (10%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Tamburino Law Group respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 33% of the reviews retrieved for Tamburino Law Group. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 21% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score63.1/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile15th percentileCompared with the fixed Minneapolis, MN cohort.
Tracked Google reviews140Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved140Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed126Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate33%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate67%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions21%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index82.5Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Minneapolis, MN

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

63.1/100

Score percentile

15th percentile

Rating percentile

15th percentile

Review-count percentile

50th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 126 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-820572d13f7794a5
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-e6b657e543797f26
Brand relationship
Tamburino Law Group

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentwrongful deathdog bite

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.9
Avg Review Length
442 chars
Local Guide %
27%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal services

About

Facing criminal charges in Minnesota? Don't face them alone. Tamburino Law Group has over a century of combined experience defending clients in state & federal courts. Our team of Minneapolis criminal...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 126 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
33%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
67%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
21%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
44%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
13%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
6%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 102 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
126 (90%)
4 star
2 (1.4%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
12 (8.6%)
92% positive reviews 8% negative reviews Consistency index: 82.5

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 66.7% of reviews
professionalism 43.7% of reviews
communication 20.6% of reviews
expertise 18.3% of reviews
case results 12.7% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (90%)
passed around (10%)

Other Personal Injury in Minneapolis

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 140 retrieved reviews and 126 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:22Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:29:22Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:58.
  • 140 total Google reviews tracked; 140 reviews retrieved; 126 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Minneapolis personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Minnesota personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →