Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 2, 2026

NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

140 Broadway 46th Floor, PMB 300, New York, NY 10005

4.9 · 63 Google reviews

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 67.0 / 100
Within-market percentile
30.3th percentile
Evidence depth
Minimum evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. is a personal injury attorney in New York, NY with a 4.9-star rating across 63 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 63 reviews for this profile and analyzed 60 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 92% of retrieved reviews, 30% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 8% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 88.3.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (30%), case results (18%), and speed (15%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving motorcycle and slip and fall. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (30%), case results (18%), and speed (15%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. legitimate?

NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. is listed on Google as a public business profile at 140 Broadway 46th Floor, PMB 300, New York, NY 10005, with 63 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. a good law firm?

NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 63 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 63 reviews and analyzed 60 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 92% of retrieved reviews, 30% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 8% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. reviews complain about?

NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. reviews show no recurring complaint category in the current analyzed sample. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. respond to reviews?

NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. has replied to 92% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 8% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score67/100Minimum evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile30.3th percentileCompared with the fixed New York, NY cohort.
Tracked Google reviews63Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved63Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed60Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate92%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate30%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions8%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions12%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions18%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions3%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index88.3Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time120 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in New York, NY

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

67/100

Score percentile

30.3th percentile

Rating percentile

87.9th percentile

Review-count percentile

9.1th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Minimum evidence from 60 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-7eb60ce53df64689
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-6246d6de333c3cfb
Brand relationship
NYC Injury Attorneys P.C.

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

5.0%

3 matches: 3 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Jul 11, 2022

Latest dated review

Mar 27, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

63 retrieved of 63 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

5

Average rating: 4.60/5

Year-over-year comparison withheld

The retrieved history does not yet meet the full-window coverage and rating-count gate for a fair twelve-month comparison.

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

motorcycleslip and fall

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
1.3
Avg Review Length
85 chars
Local Guide %
5%

Practice Areas

Civil law attorneyLaw firmAttorneyTrial attorney

About

NYC Injury Attorneys P.C. is your trusted partner in the heart of New York City when it comes to personal injury law. With a steadfast commitment to justice and a track record of securing maximum comp...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
57 (90%)
4 star
5 (7.9%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (1.6%)
98% positive reviews 2% negative reviews Consistency index: 88.3

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 30% of reviews
case results 18.3% of reviews
speed 15% of reviews
professionalism 11.7% of reviews
expertise 10% of reviews

Other Personal Injury in New York

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 63 retrieved reviews and 60 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Apr 2, 2026.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 11:51:29.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-04-02 11:53:01; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:21.
  • • 63 total Google reviews tracked; 63 reviews retrieved; 60 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Review-history snapshot: Apr 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all New York personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore NY personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →