Barasch & McGarry Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

11 Park Pl 18th Floor, New York, NY 10007

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.6
178 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Barasch & McGarry is a personal injury attorney in New York, New York with a 4.6-star rating across 178 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 178 reviews for this profile and analyzed 139 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 17% of retrieved reviews, 45% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 9% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 77.7.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (45%), professionalism (44%), and case results (29%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Barasch & McGarry Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (45%), professionalism (44%), and case results (29%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Barasch & McGarry legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Barasch & McGarry at 11 Park Pl 18th Floor, New York, NY 10007. The listing has 178 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Barasch & McGarry a good law firm?

Barasch & McGarry has a 4.6/5 public Google rating across 178 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 178 reviews and analyzed 139 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 17% of retrieved reviews, 45% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 9% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Barasch & McGarry reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (29%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Barasch & McGarry respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 17% of the reviews retrieved for Barasch & McGarry. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 9% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score54.8/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile3th percentileCompared with the fixed New York, NY cohort.
Tracked Google reviews178Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved178Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed139Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate17%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate45%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions9%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index77.7Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in New York, NY

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

54.8/100

Score percentile

3th percentile

Rating percentile

15.2th percentile

Review-count percentile

57.6th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 139 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-ec2d842b2051a894
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-1978bfa881a39645
Brand relationship
Barasch & McGarry

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

medical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
1
Avg Review Length
406 chars
Local Guide %
40%

Practice Areas

Law firm

About

Were you there on 9/11 or during the months that followed? Over $15+ Billion available for 9/11 victims including residents, office workers, teachers, students, first responders, volunteers, construc...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 139 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
17%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
45%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
9%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
44%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
29%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
15%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 154.3 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
155 (87%)
4 star
7 (3.9%)
3 star
4 (2.2%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
12 (6.7%)
90% positive reviews 9% negative reviews Consistency index: 77.7

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 44.6% of reviews
professionalism 43.9% of reviews
case results 28.8% of reviews
compassion and care 15.1% of reviews
dedication 14.4% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (28.6%)

Other Personal Injury in New York

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 178 retrieved reviews and 139 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:07Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:30:22Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:57.
  • 178 total Google reviews tracked; 178 reviews retrieved; 139 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all New York personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore New York personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →