Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C. Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

233 Broadway Suite 701, New York, NY 10279

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.9
73 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C. is a criminal justice attorney in New York, New York with a 4.9-star rating across 73 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 73 reviews for this profile and analyzed 66 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 6% of retrieved reviews, 59% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 17% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 95.5.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (59%), professionalism (35%), and communication (17%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving medical malpractice and wrongful death. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C. Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (59%), professionalism (35%), and communication (17%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C. legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C. at 233 Broadway Suite 701, New York, NY 10279. The listing has 73 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C. a good law firm?

Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C. has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 73 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 73 reviews and analyzed 66 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 6% of retrieved reviews, 59% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 17% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C. reviews complain about?

The current analyzed sample does not contain a recurring complaint category for Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C.. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C. respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 6% of the reviews retrieved for Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C.. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 17% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score67.3/100Minimum evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile33.3th percentileCompared with the fixed New York, NY cohort.
Tracked Google reviews73Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved73Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed66Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate6%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate59%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions17%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index95.5Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in New York, NY

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

67.3/100

Score percentile

33.3th percentile

Rating percentile

87.9th percentile

Review-count percentile

15.2th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Minimum evidence from 66 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-a803bf8fb2e9d737
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-4ad2a1a46bcab388
Brand relationship
Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C.

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

medical malpracticewrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.6
Avg Review Length
354 chars
Local Guide %
15%

Practice Areas

Personal injury attorney

About

Experienced in criminal defense, personal injury and civil rights litigation, Manhattan-based law firm at Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C., has the knowledge and skills to advocate for you. Our attorneys h...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 66 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
6%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
59%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
17%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
35%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
14%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
6%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 156.1 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
71 (97%)
4 star
0 (0%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
1 (1.4%)
1 star
1 (1.4%)
97% positive reviews 3% negative reviews Consistency index: 95.5

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 59.1% of reviews
professionalism 34.8% of reviews
communication 16.7% of reviews
dedication 16.7% of reviews
expertise 15.2% of reviews

Other Personal Injury in New York

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 73 retrieved reviews and 66 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:14Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:29:03Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:57.
  • 73 total Google reviews tracked; 73 reviews retrieved; 66 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all New York personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore New York personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →