Udeshi Law Firm Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

2201 Main St #600, Dallas, TX 75201

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.4
256 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Udeshi Law Firm is a attorney in Dallas, Texas with a 4.4-star rating across 256 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 256 reviews for this profile and analyzed 190 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 42% of retrieved reviews, 59% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 22% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is mixed based on a consistency index of 65.3.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (59%), professionalism (30%), and communication (22%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Udeshi Law Firm Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (59%), professionalism (30%), and communication (22%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Udeshi Law Firm legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Udeshi Law Firm at 2201 Main St #600, Dallas, TX 75201. The listing has 256 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Udeshi Law Firm a good law firm?

Udeshi Law Firm has a 4.4/5 public Google rating across 256 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 256 reviews and analyzed 190 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 42% of retrieved reviews, 59% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 22% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Udeshi Law Firm reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (13%), passed around (6%), and poor communication (3%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Udeshi Law Firm respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 42% of the reviews retrieved for Udeshi Law Firm. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 22% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score53.5/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile3th percentileCompared with the fixed Dallas, TX cohort.
Tracked Google reviews256Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved256Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed190Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate42%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate59%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions22%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index65.3Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Dallas, TX

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

53.5/100

Score percentile

3th percentile

Rating percentile

3th percentile

Review-count percentile

48.5th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 190 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-dcfa26906353f21f
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-71ea78f41fb8fbad
Brand relationship
Udeshi Law Firm

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accident

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2.2
Avg Review Length
280 chars
Local Guide %
21%

Practice Areas

Criminal justice attorneyFamily law attorneyPersonal injury attorney

About

The attorney's at Udeshi Law Firm, PLLC are experienced in providing high-quality representation in all family law, personal injury and criminal defense. Our lawyers have helped countless families thr...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 190 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
42%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
59%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
22%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
30%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
10%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
6%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 176.8 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
211 (82%)
4 star
10 (3.9%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
2 (<1%)
1 star
33 (13%)
83% positive reviews 17% negative reviews Consistency index: 65.3

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 58.9% of reviews
professionalism 30% of reviews
communication 21.6% of reviews
case results 9.5% of reviews
expertise 8.9% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (12.5%)
passed around (6.2%)
poor communication (3.1%)

Other Personal Injury in Dallas

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 256 retrieved reviews and 190 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:04Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:30:24Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:10:00.
  • 256 total Google reviews tracked; 256 reviews retrieved; 190 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Dallas personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Texas personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →