Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 12, 2026

Amaro Law Firm Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

2351 W Northwest Hwy Ste 2306, Dallas, TX 75220

4.9 · 183 Google reviews
Compare all tracked Amaro Law Firm locations

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 71.6 / 100
Within-market percentile
45th percentile
Evidence depth
Moderate evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

Amaro Law Firm is a personal injury attorney in Dallas, Texas with a 4.9-star rating across 183 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 183 reviews for this profile and analyzed 130 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 96% of retrieved reviews, 54% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 7% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 97.7.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (54%), professionalism (24%), and communication (7%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, workplace injury, and wrongful death. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Amaro Law Firm review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

Amaro Law Firm reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (54%), professionalism (24%), and communication (7%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Amaro Law Firm legitimate?

Amaro Law Firm is listed on Google as a public business profile at 2351 W Northwest Hwy Ste 2306, Dallas, TX 75220, with 183 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Amaro Law Firm a good law firm?

Amaro Law Firm has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 183 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 183 reviews and analyzed 130 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 96% of retrieved reviews, 54% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 7% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Amaro Law Firm reviews complain about?

Amaro Law Firm reviews show no recurring complaint category in the current analyzed sample. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Amaro Law Firm respond to reviews?

Amaro Law Firm has replied to 96% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 7% of analyzed review texts.

Could experiences vary by location?

Yes. This evidence covers the Dallas, Texas office. Compare all tracked Amaro Law Firm offices before generalizing this location's rating, praise, or concern signals to the wider brand.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score71.6/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile45th percentileCompared with the fixed Dallas, TX cohort.
Tracked Google reviews183Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved183Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed130Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate96%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate54%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions7%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions24%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions3%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions0.8%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index97.7Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time51 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Dallas, TX

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

71.6/100

Score percentile

45th percentile

Rating percentile

80th percentile

Review-count percentile

35th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 130 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-8320993d8f011c68
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-amaro-law-firm

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidenttruck accidentworkplace injurywrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2.1
Avg Review Length
117 chars
Local Guide %
13%

Practice Areas

Insurance attorneyLaw firmAttorneyLegal servicesTrial attorney

About

Amaro Law Firm represents injury victims in Dallas and across North Texas. Our trial attorneys handle car accidents, 18-wheeler and commercial truck collisions on I-35E, I-635, and the Dallas North To...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
179 (98%)
4 star
1 (<1%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
1 (<1%)
1 star
1 (<1%)
99% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 97.7

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 53.8% of reviews
professionalism 23.8% of reviews
communication 6.9% of reviews
speed 6.2% of reviews
dedication 4.6% of reviews

Other truck-accident in Dallas

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 183 retrieved reviews and 130 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:44:55Z.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:28:23Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:58.
  • • 183 total Google reviews tracked; 183 reviews retrieved; 130 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Dallas truck-accident lawyers ranked by public review signals
Compare this office in the Workers' Compensation cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →