Stephen R. Martay, Attorney At Law Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

134 N LaSalle St FL 9, Chicago, IL 60602

4.9
418 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Stephen R. Martay, Attorney At Law is a personal injury attorney in Chicago, Illinois with a 4.9-star rating across 418 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 418 reviews for this profile and analyzed 331 text reviews. The firm replies to 100% of public reviews, 68% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 20% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 96.4.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (68%), professionalism (32%), and case results (32%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, medical malpractice, workplace injury, and wrongful death. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews418Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved418Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed331Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate100%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate68%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions20%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index96.4Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
5.3
Avg Review Length
239 chars
Local Guide %
15%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorney

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 331 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
100%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
68%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
20%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
32%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
32%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
6%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 125.1 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
402 (96%)
4 star
12 (2.9%)
3 star
2 (<1%)
2 star
1 (<1%)
1 star
1 (<1%)
99% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 96.4

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 68.3% of reviews
professionalism 32.3% of reviews
case results 32.3% of reviews
communication 20.2% of reviews
speed 18.4% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

poor communication (25%)

Recent Reviews

Emily Cannon
a week ago
Julie Mainard

Anytime or anything I need he responded quickly

a week ago
Dirtydark101

Fantastic work no unnecessary questions or drama very up to date with information very professional highly recommended! Mr. Martay will get the job done again highly recommended. And thank you again sir ! Alex gatheright.

a week ago
Patricia Hosey
a week ago
Arthur Alvarez

I was injured at work and Stephen did an incredible job with my case and went above and beyond. Much thanks and appreciation.

a week ago

Other Personal Injury in Chicago

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 418 retrieved reviews and 331 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 12:25:51.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 12:25:51.
  • 418 total Google reviews tracked; 418 reviews retrieved; 331 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 12:25:51, reviews: 2026-04-06 17:01:25, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:25.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Chicago personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews