80 S 8th St #5120, Minneapolis, MN 55402
Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.
Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, P.A. is a personal injury attorney in Minneapolis, Minnesota with a 4.9-star rating across 509 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 509 reviews for this profile and analyzed 450 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 32% of retrieved reviews, 84% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 26% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 99.1.
The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (84%), professionalism (37%), and case results (28%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (84%), professionalism (37%), and case results (28%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, P.A. at 80 S 8th St #5120, Minneapolis, MN 55402. The listing has 509 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, P.A. has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 509 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 509 reviews and analyzed 450 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 32% of retrieved reviews, 84% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 26% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (100%) and passed around (100%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Public review data shows an owner reply on 32% of the reviews retrieved for Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, P.A.. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 26% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 79.4/100 | Strong evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 80th percentile | Compared with the fixed Minneapolis, MN cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 509 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 509 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 450 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 32% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 84% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 26% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Consistency index | 99.1 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
79.4/100
Score percentile
80th percentile
Rating percentile
70th percentile
Review-count percentile
90th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
Not scored
Strong evidence from 450 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
8.9%
40 matches: 40 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
8.2%
37 matches: 30 positive, 0 negative, 7 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.
3.1%
14 matches: 14 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 6, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Jul 21, 2014
Latest dated review
Apr 1, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
509 retrieved of 509 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
62
Average rating: 4.95/5
Average rating
0.00 stars
4.95/5 in the recent period vs. 4.95/5 in the prior period
Review activity
-12 reviews
62 recent reviews vs. 74 in the prior period
Replies to 1–3-star reviews
80%
4 replies across 5 retrieved low-star reviews
Replies to 4–5-star reviews
30%
153 replies across 504 retrieved high-star reviews
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
Experienced, board-certified personal injury and car accident attorneys with headquarters in Minneapolis, MN provide legal services to personal injury accident victims in Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, N...
Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Based on analysis of 450 text reviews in the current build.
Q: Lawyer suggestions or should I represent myself? 1)medical negligence 2)secondary medical injury during or resulting from surgery 3)personal injury(self and 3 minor children) 4)
A: Hi Roxana. I don’t have a specific referral for you but if you called our office, an attorney would be happy to help. (612) 377-7777
— Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, P.A.
Q: Do you help with medical malpractice?
A: We do not, but if you call our office we may be able to find you a referral. (612) 377-7777
— Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, P.A.
Q: I was injuried from a fall caaused by loss damaged floor tile. Is there a time limit for filing?
A: Yes there is. Each type of case has a statute of limitations usually starting at about 2 yrs
— Schennile Rodgers
Q: Do they do malpractice?
A: Not medical. Byt they refer you to a top firm that does
— Chris Bryant
Q: Are you probono?
A: Hi Anna. We work on a contingency fee basis, which means that you only pay attorneys' fees if we win you a settlement.
— Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, P.A.
Q: Are there other offices
A: You can find out by going online or calling. Their main ofc is in downtown Minneapolis. They are licensed though in many states
— Chris Bryant
Q: My name is Charlotte Dorothy Jones, iam a targeted individual, I live at 521 Milky way st. S. Cosmos mn. 56228, this guestion is for Schwebel, Goety and Siebem, can you come to my house in Cosmos, you know why!
A: Call them
— Chris Bryant