Sand Law, LLC Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

400 S 4th St Suite 401-217, Minneapolis, MN 55415

4.9
33 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Sand Law, LLC is a personal injury attorney in Minneapolis, Minnesota with a 4.9-star rating across 33 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 33 reviews for this profile and analyzed 20 text reviews. The firm replies to 90% of public reviews, 20% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 5% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 90.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (20%), professionalism (15%), and communication (5%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving medical malpractice and wrongful death. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews33Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved33Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed20Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate90%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate20%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions5%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index90Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

medical malpracticewrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.3
Avg Review Length
134 chars
Local Guide %
10%

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 20 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
90%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
20%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
15%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
0%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 231 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
32 (97%)
4 star
0 (0%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (3%)
95% positive reviews 5% negative reviews Consistency index: 90

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 20% of reviews
professionalism 15% of reviews
communication 5% of reviews
case results 5% of reviews
expertise 5% of reviews

Recent Reviews

N Jefferson
2 months ago
Michael Johnson Local Guide

Tom Strand of Sand Law successfully represented us in a wrongful death lawsuit.

2 months ago
Steve Sontgerath Local Guide
7 months ago
Katie Ristow

Tyler at Sand Law fumbled my family of fives major injury caused by a police pursuit case. I could say a lot but I'll hold my tongue. Staff changed multiple times, nothing moved on our case, 3/4 of our files were lost. Thankfully we were able to be released from our contract and have an attorney who...

11 months ago
Noah Skifton
a year ago

Other Personal Injury in Minneapolis

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 33 retrieved reviews and 20 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 14:43:29.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 14:43:29.
  • 33 total Google reviews tracked; 33 reviews retrieved; 20 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 14:43:29, reviews: 2026-04-02 14:46:14, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:28.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Minneapolis personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews