Riddle & Riddle Injury Lawyers Charlotte Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

1914 J N Pease Pl Suite 142, Charlotte, NC 28262

4.9
51 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Riddle & Riddle Injury Lawyers Charlotte is a personal injury attorney in Charlotte, North Carolina with a 4.9-star rating across 51 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 51 reviews for this profile and analyzed 30 text reviews. The firm replies to 97% of public reviews, 37% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 17% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 96.7.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (37%), case results (27%), and professionalism (20%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews51Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved51Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed30Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate97%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate37%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions17%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index96.7Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmedical malpracticeworkplace injury

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.6
Avg Review Length
247 chars
Local Guide %
20%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal servicesSocial security attorneyTrial attorney

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 30 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
97%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
37%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
17%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
20%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
27%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
3%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 125 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
49 (96%)
4 star
1 (2%)
3 star
1 (2%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
100% positive reviews Consistency index: 96.7

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 36.7% of reviews
case results 26.7% of reviews
professionalism 20% of reviews
communication 16.7% of reviews
speed 10% of reviews

Recent Reviews

Stella Aguilar

I recommend them 100%.

a month ago
Tarel Bartell
2 months ago
zoe Grice

Overall my experience was really good. Both Mr Donald fuller and Adam smith did a wonderful job. Every question I had Mr fuller answered it and made sure the process was easy. They did an outstanding job and I’m so thankful for all of their help.

2 months ago
Teresa Carter
2 months ago
quddus dibble

Great communication, great results

2 months ago

Other Personal Injury in Charlotte

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 51 retrieved reviews and 30 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 13:16:42.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 13:16:42.
  • 51 total Google reviews tracked; 51 reviews retrieved; 30 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 13:16:42, reviews: 2026-04-02 13:19:41, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:27.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Charlotte personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews