Powell and Pisman Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

5351 W Belmont Ave, Chicago, IL 60641

4.9
430 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Powell and Pisman is a personal injury attorney in Chicago, Illinois with a 4.9-star rating across 430 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 426 reviews for this profile and analyzed 263 text reviews. The firm replies to 21% of public reviews, 52% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 11% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 90.1.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (52%), professionalism (23%), and communication (11%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, medical malpractice, and dog bite. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews430Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved426Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed263Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate21%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate52%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions11%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index90.1Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmedical malpracticedog bite

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
3.1
Avg Review Length
126 chars
Local Guide %
11%

Practice Areas

Civil law attorneyElder law attorneyInsurance attorneyLaw firmAttorneyLegal services

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 263 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
21%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
52%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
11%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
23%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
8%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 240.5 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
410 (95%)
4 star
5 (1.2%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
1 (<1%)
1 star
13 (3%)
95% positive reviews 5% negative reviews Consistency index: 90.1

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 51.7% of reviews
professionalism 23.2% of reviews
communication 10.6% of reviews
case results 7.6% of reviews
expertise 6.5% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (25%)

Recent Reviews

Daniel Methene

Great service got good results.

5 days ago
Reyna Brito

i am more than happy with the services and help provided to me by this company they did more than an excellent job with my case and getting me the help and assistance that was owed to me kept me well informed and updated with my case

6 days ago
Ihor Khatuntsev

All I can say is these guy know their job. They’ll walk you through the whole process and give you all answers to your question. I didn't think my case would be a winner but everything worked out. Overall, do not hesitate to ask these guys for help

a week ago
Daniel Alvarez

I was in a car accident and I received a call on Sunday morning from a third-party, knowing that I was in a car accident, he explained to me how to go about things and recommended Powell and Pisman so I retained that law firm To represent me I was not aware that I had a SI joint fracture Until after...

a week ago
Saniya Winn
2 weeks ago

Other Personal Injury in Chicago

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 426 retrieved reviews and 263 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 12:25:51.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 12:25:51.
  • 430 total Google reviews tracked; 426 reviews retrieved; 263 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 12:25:51, reviews: 2026-04-06 17:01:19, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:25.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Chicago personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews