Morgan & Morgan Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

121 N Washington Ave 4th Floor, Minneapolis, MN 55401

4.7
580 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Morgan & Morgan is a personal injury attorney in Minneapolis, Minnesota with a 4.7-star rating across 580 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 347 reviews for this profile and analyzed 102 text reviews. The firm replies to 97% of public reviews, 10% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 7% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is mixed based on a consistency index of 64.7.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (10%), professionalism (9%), and case results (9%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews580Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved347Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed102Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate97%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate10%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions7%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index64.7Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

workplace injury

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
1.9
Avg Review Length
112 chars
Local Guide %
26%

Practice Areas

Business attorneyEmployment attorneyLaw firm

About

As America's Largest Injury Law Firm, we believe you deserve to have the best life, so our goal is to fight to get you the best results. For over 35 years, Morgan & Morgan has been fighting for the pe...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 102 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
97%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
10%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
7%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
9%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
9%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
0%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 91.2 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
478 (82%)
4 star
52 (9%)
3 star
24 (4.1%)
2 star
4 (<1%)
1 star
22 (3.8%)
81% positive reviews 13% negative reviews Consistency index: 64.7

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 9.8% of reviews
professionalism 8.8% of reviews
case results 8.8% of reviews
communication 6.9% of reviews
speed 5.9% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (5.3%)

Recent Reviews

Chris Russelburg
2 days ago
canda corcoran
a week ago
Rontech44

Great work

Edited a week ago
Holly Hamilton
a week ago
aglenn1005 Local Guide
a week ago

Questions & Answers

Q: Do you take on Workmans Comp cases? In California?

A: Hi! Thank you for reaching out! Please give us a call so we can further assist as we have offices in all 50 states and do handle Workman's Comp cases. You can reach us 24/7 by dialing #LAW from your cell phone. Looking forward to hearing from you!

— Morgan & Morgan

Other Personal Injury in Minneapolis

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 347 retrieved reviews and 102 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 14:43:28.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 14:47:34.
  • 580 total Google reviews tracked; 347 reviews retrieved; 102 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 14:43:28, reviews: 2026-04-06 17:00:45, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:28.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Minneapolis personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews