Monge & Associates Injury and Accident Attorneys Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

331 2nd Ave S Suite 455, Minneapolis, MN 55401

4.9
54 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Monge & Associates Injury and Accident Attorneys is a personal injury attorney in Minneapolis, Minnesota with a 4.9-star rating across 54 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 54 reviews for this profile and analyzed 40 text reviews. The firm replies to 100% of public reviews, 15% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 0% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 100.

The most common review themes are professionalism (18%), speed (18%), and explicit recommendation (15%). Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews54Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved54Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed40Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate100%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate15%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions0%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index100Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2.7
Avg Review Length
119 chars
Local Guide %
3%

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 40 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
100%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
15%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
0%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
18%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
3%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 68.8 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
53 (98%)
4 star
0 (0%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (1.9%)
100% positive reviews Consistency index: 100

What Clients Praise

professionalism 17.5% of reviews
speed 17.5% of reviews
explicit recommendation 15% of reviews
expertise 10% of reviews
compassion and care 5% of reviews

Recent Reviews

Kody Oliver

Quick and very helpful

2 months ago
Alexyss Smith

Joseph was quick and easily explained the entire process to me

2 months ago
Jay

Person I talked to on the phone was very helpful getting us started with our insurance claim. Appreciate the professionalism and she was very nice.

2 months ago
Vendetta 223
2 months ago
zikia smith
3 months ago

Other Personal Injury in Minneapolis

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 54 retrieved reviews and 40 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 14:43:29.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 14:43:29.
  • 54 total Google reviews tracked; 54 reviews retrieved; 40 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 14:43:29, reviews: 2026-04-02 14:45:57, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:28.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Minneapolis personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews