Leav & Steinberg, LLP Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

75 Broad St #1601, New York, NY 10004

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.7
135 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Leav & Steinberg, LLP is a law firm in New York, New York with a 4.7-star rating across 135 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 135 reviews for this profile and analyzed 112 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 79% of retrieved reviews, 97% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 24% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 86.6.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (97%), professionalism (63%), and case results (29%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, motorcycle, and slip and fall. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Leav & Steinberg, LLP Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (97%), professionalism (63%), and case results (29%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Leav & Steinberg, LLP legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Leav & Steinberg, LLP at 75 Broad St #1601, New York, NY 10004. The listing has 135 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Leav & Steinberg, LLP a good law firm?

Leav & Steinberg, LLP has a 4.7/5 public Google rating across 135 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 135 reviews and analyzed 112 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 79% of retrieved reviews, 97% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 24% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Leav & Steinberg, LLP reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (56%) and poor communication (11%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Leav & Steinberg, LLP respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 79% of the reviews retrieved for Leav & Steinberg, LLP. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 24% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score73.9/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile60th percentileCompared with the fixed New York, NY cohort.
Tracked Google reviews135Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved135Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed112Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate79%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate97%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions24%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index86.6Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in New York, NY

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

73.9/100

Score percentile

60th percentile

Rating percentile

50th percentile

Review-count percentile

60th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 112 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-6295b406d09f7d78
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-c1e292f9f2d04c4d
Brand relationship
Leav & Steinberg, LLP

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidenttruck accidentmotorcycleslip and fallmedical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
1.1
Avg Review Length
432 chars
Local Guide %
21%

Practice Areas

AttorneyPersonal injury attorneyTrial attorney

About

Leav & Steinberg LLP is a law firm helping seriously injured clients explore their legal options in New York, NY. We provide litigation and defense for those injured due to fault or negligence of anot...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 112 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
79%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
97%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
24%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
63%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
29%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
18%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 127.5 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
122 (90%)
4 star
3 (2.2%)
3 star
2 (1.5%)
2 star
3 (2.2%)
1 star
5 (3.7%)
92% positive reviews 7% negative reviews Consistency index: 86.6

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 97.3% of reviews
professionalism 63.4% of reviews
case results 28.6% of reviews
communication 24.1% of reviews
compassion and care 17.9% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (55.6%)
poor communication (11.1%)

Other Medical Malpractice in New York

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 135 retrieved reviews and 112 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:16Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:29:12Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:54.
  • 135 total Google reviews tracked; 135 reviews retrieved; 112 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all New York medical malpractice lawyers ranked by public review signals
Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →