Law Offices of Howard Sussman Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

333 N Washington Ave Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55401

5
81 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Law Offices of Howard Sussman is a personal injury attorney in Minneapolis, Minnesota with a 5.0-star rating across 81 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 81 reviews for this profile and analyzed 79 text reviews. The firm replies to 1% of public reviews, 90% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 13% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 97.5.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (90%), professionalism (23%), and case results (18%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews81Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved81Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed79Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate1%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate90%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions13%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index97.5Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcyclemedical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.6
Avg Review Length
263 chars
Local Guide %
22%

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 79 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
1%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
90%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
13%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
23%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
18%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
8%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 320.9 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
80 (99%)
4 star
0 (0%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (1.2%)
99% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 97.5

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 89.9% of reviews
professionalism 22.8% of reviews
case results 17.7% of reviews
transparency 13.9% of reviews
communication 12.7% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (100%)

Recent Reviews

Edward Towah

Foremost thing was that Howard Sussman approached my car accident bodily injury claim with honesty. I appreciated that he told me everything without assuming things. He asked me what was important for me and that was really good.

a year ago
Nordeast Bea Local Guide
a year ago
Eric Williams

I greatly appreciate the services that Howard Sussman and his staff did for me. Other people blamed me for a multi vehicle crash, but Mr. Sussman gathered the evidence to show that the other drivers were at fault. This allowed me to get a bodily injury settlement for my injuries that I am very ...

a year ago
Kunnary Lou

We hired Mr. Sussman because the car insurance company blamed my husband for causing the car crash. Mr. Sussman and his staff worked hard in gathering information that resulted in the other driver’s insurance company to pay for the total loss of our car.

a year ago
Antoinette Barry

I am very happy with the job Howard Sussman did for me. I will recommend Howard Sussman to my friends and family when they need a personal I jury lawyer.

a year ago

Other Personal Injury in Minneapolis

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 81 retrieved reviews and 79 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 14:43:29.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 14:43:29.
  • 81 total Google reviews tracked; 81 reviews retrieved; 79 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 14:43:29, reviews: 2026-04-02 14:45:40, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:28.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Minneapolis personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews