Fielding Law Group Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

14900 Interurban Ave S Ste 271-45, Seattle, WA 98168

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

4.8
403 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Fielding Law Group is a personal injury attorney in Seattle, Washington with a 4.8-star rating across 403 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 403 reviews for this profile and analyzed 215 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 47% of retrieved reviews, 37% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 22% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 91.6.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (37%), communication (22%), and case results (18%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Fielding Law Group Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (37%), communication (22%), and case results (18%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Fielding Law Group legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Fielding Law Group at 14900 Interurban Ave S Ste 271-45, Seattle, WA 98168. The listing has 403 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Fielding Law Group a good law firm?

Fielding Law Group has a 4.8/5 public Google rating across 403 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 403 reviews and analyzed 215 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 47% of retrieved reviews, 37% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 22% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Fielding Law Group reviews complain about?

The current analyzed sample does not contain a recurring complaint category for Fielding Law Group. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Fielding Law Group respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 47% of the reviews retrieved for Fielding Law Group. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 22% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score66.8/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile23.7th percentileCompared with the fixed Seattle, WA cohort.
Tracked Google reviews403Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved403Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed215Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate47%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate37%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions22%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index91.6Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Seattle, WA

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

66.8/100

Score percentile

23.7th percentile

Rating percentile

28.6th percentile

Review-count percentile

78.6th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

11.9th percentile

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 215 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-2563d536f527217f
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-40dc9092a5ae4286
Brand relationship
Fielding Law Group

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

5.6%

12 matches: 12 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

3.7%

8 matches: 6 positive, 0 negative, 2 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

1.4%

3 matches: 3 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Jul 26, 2017

Latest dated review

Jul 6, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

403 retrieved of 403 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

30

Average rating: 4.87/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.02 stars

4.87/5 in the recent period vs. 4.85/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-54 reviews

30 recent reviews vs. 84 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

0%

0 replies across 14 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

41%

160 replies across 389 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmedical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2
Avg Review Length
170 chars
Local Guide %
21%

Practice Areas

Law firmLegal servicesTrial attorney

About

Seattle-based Fielding Law Group provides personalized legal assistance to individuals seeking justice following auto accidents or facing personal injury situations. Our firm, specializing in personal...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 215 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
47%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
37%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
22%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
16%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
18%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
3%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 138.9 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
365 (91%)
4 star
24 (6%)
3 star
5 (1.2%)
2 star
3 (<1%)
1 star
6 (1.5%)
96% positive reviews 3% negative reviews Consistency index: 91.6

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 37.2% of reviews
communication 21.9% of reviews
case results 18.1% of reviews
professionalism 16.3% of reviews
speed 11.6% of reviews

Other Personal Injury in Seattle

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 403 retrieved reviews and 215 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 14:07:53.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:10; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:25.
  • 403 total Google reviews tracked; 403 reviews retrieved; 215 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Seattle personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Washington personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →