Edward M. Bernstein & Associates Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

10801 W Charleston Blvd #520, Las Vegas, NV 89135

4.5
436 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Edward M. Bernstein & Associates is a personal injury attorney in Las Vegas, Nevada with a 4.5-star rating across 436 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 438 reviews for this profile and analyzed 286 text reviews. The firm replies to 50% of public reviews, 34% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 15% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 70.6.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (34%), case results (22%), and professionalism (20%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews436Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved438Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed286Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate50%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate34%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions15%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index70.6Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcyclemedical malpracticeworkplace injury

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
1.7
Avg Review Length
244 chars
Local Guide %
23%

Practice Areas

Civil law attorneyLaw firmAttorneyLegal servicesTrial attorney

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 286 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
50%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
34%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
15%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
20%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
22%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
3%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 117.8 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
361 (83%)
4 star
24 (5.5%)
3 star
5 (1.1%)
2 star
6 (1.4%)
1 star
40 (9.2%)
87% positive reviews 13% negative reviews Consistency index: 70.6

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 33.9% of reviews
case results 22% of reviews
professionalism 20.3% of reviews
communication 14.7% of reviews
speed 11.9% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (24.3%)
poor communication (5.4%)
passed around (5.4%)

Recent Reviews

Diego Herrera

No problems whatsoever. Very great staff. Good services.

15 hours ago
Reggie

Their incredible attorneys who get the job done

17 hours ago
Ryan Ifraimov
a day ago
Austin Mullins
2 days ago
Ky-mani Wynter

Top tier service... One of the best law firms

2 days ago

Other Personal Injury in Las Vegas

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 438 retrieved reviews and 286 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 11:42:38.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 11:42:38.
  • 436 total Google reviews tracked; 438 reviews retrieved; 286 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 11:42:38, reviews: 2026-04-06 17:01:17, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:24.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Las Vegas personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews