626 S 10th St, Las Vegas, NV 89101
Benson & Bingham Car Accident & Personal Injury Lawyers is a personal injury attorney in Las Vegas, Nevada with a 4.9-star rating across 932 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 932 reviews for this profile and analyzed 900 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 74% of retrieved reviews, 80% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 21% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 96.4.
The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (80%), professionalism (26%), and case results (22%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (80%), professionalism (26%), and case results (22%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Benson & Bingham Car Accident & Personal Injury Lawyers at 626 S 10th St, Las Vegas, NV 89101. The listing has 932 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Benson & Bingham Car Accident & Personal Injury Lawyers has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 932 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 932 reviews and analyzed 900 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 74% of retrieved reviews, 80% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 21% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (27%) and passed around (9%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Public review data shows an owner reply on 74% of the reviews retrieved for Benson & Bingham Car Accident & Personal Injury Lawyers. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 21% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Tracked Google reviews | 932 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 932 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 900 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 74% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 80% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 21% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Consistency index | 96.4 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 6, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Jun 20, 2011
Latest dated review
Apr 5, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
932 retrieved of 932 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
100
Average rating: 4.92/5
Average rating
-0.03 stars
4.92/5 in the recent period vs. 4.95/5 in the prior period
Review activity
-30 reviews
100 recent reviews vs. 130 in the prior period
Replies to 1–3-star reviews
33%
6 replies across 18 retrieved low-star reviews
Replies to 4–5-star reviews
75%
685 replies across 914 retrieved high-star reviews
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Based on analysis of 900 text reviews in the current build.