Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 2, 2026

Tingey Injury Law Firm Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

817 S Main St, Las Vegas, NV 89101

5 · 515 Google reviews

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 81.0 / 100
Within-market percentile
85th percentile
Evidence depth
Strong evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

Tingey Injury Law Firm is a personal injury attorney in Las Vegas, Nevada with a 5.0-star rating across 515 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 516 reviews for this profile and analyzed 474 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 100% of retrieved reviews, 64% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 18% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 98.3.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (64%), professionalism (25%), and communication (18%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, medical malpractice, and wrongful death. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Tingey Injury Law Firm review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

Tingey Injury Law Firm reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (64%), professionalism (25%), and communication (18%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Tingey Injury Law Firm legitimate?

Tingey Injury Law Firm is listed on Google as a public business profile at 817 S Main St, Las Vegas, NV 89101, with 515 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Tingey Injury Law Firm a good law firm?

Tingey Injury Law Firm has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 515 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 516 reviews and analyzed 474 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 100% of retrieved reviews, 64% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 18% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Tingey Injury Law Firm reviews complain about?

Tingey Injury Law Firm reviews show no recurring complaint category in the current analyzed sample. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Tingey Injury Law Firm respond to reviews?

Tingey Injury Law Firm has replied to 100% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 18% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score81/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile85th percentileCompared with the fixed Las Vegas, NV cohort.
Tracked Google reviews515Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved516Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed474Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate100%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate64%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions18%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions25%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions13%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions6%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index98.3Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time120.7 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Las Vegas, NV

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

81/100

Score percentile

85th percentile

Rating percentile

100th percentile

Review-count percentile

72.5th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 474 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-60b34dcbf4508da2
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-577964ff41850ce4
Brand relationship
Tingey Injury Law Firm

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

9.9%

47 matches: 46 positive, 1 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

3.2%

15 matches: 12 positive, 0 negative, 3 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

0.8%

4 matches: 4 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Apr 9, 2016

Latest dated review

Jul 31, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

515 retrieved of 515 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

138

Average rating: 4.99/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.06 stars

4.99/5 in the recent period vs. 4.93/5 in the prior period

Review activity

+27 reviews

138 recent reviews vs. 111 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

67%

4 replies across 6 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

100%

509 replies across 509 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcyclemedical malpracticewrongful deathdog bite

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
4.4
Avg Review Length
234 chars
Local Guide %
10%

Practice Areas

Civil law attorneyElder law attorneyLaw firmAttorneyTrial attorney

About

At Tingey Injury Law Firm, we've built our reputation on the Maximum Recovery System and Tingey Method™ — strategies that consistently deliver maximum compensation for car accident victims throughout ...

Source-Backed Website Signals

Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.

Intake And Fee Signals

Free consultation stated Contingency fee mentioned No fee unless recovery stated 24/7 availability stated Contact form observed Phone intake observed

Languages And Practice Signals

Languages
No source-backed language list captured yet.
Practice Areas Mentioned On Site
brain injury car accident dog bite medical malpractice motorcycle accident pedestrian accident slip and fall truck accident workers compensation wrongful death

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
506 (98%)
4 star
3 (<1%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
1 (<1%)
1 star
4 (<1%)
99% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 98.3

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 64.3% of reviews
professionalism 24.5% of reviews
communication 17.5% of reviews
speed 14.6% of reviews
case results 12.7% of reviews

Other Personal Injury in Las Vegas

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 516 retrieved reviews and 474 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • • 3 captured pages from the firm's website support the displayed self-reported intake signals, languages, and practice-area mentions.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 11:42:38.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:11; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:21.
  • • 515 total Google reviews tracked; 516 reviews retrieved; 474 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Las Vegas personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Nevada personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Workers' Compensation cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →