Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 2, 2026

Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

300 S 4th St Ste 1400, Las Vegas, NV 89101

5 · 835 Google reviews

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 72.8 / 100
Within-market percentile
50th percentile
Evidence depth
Strong evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers is a personal injury attorney in Las Vegas, Nevada with a 5.0-star rating across 835 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 834 reviews for this profile and analyzed 783 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 30% of retrieved reviews, 58% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 13% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 99.4.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (58%), professionalism (28%), and case results (16%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (58%), professionalism (28%), and case results (16%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers legitimate?

Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers is listed on Google as a public business profile at 300 S 4th St Ste 1400, Las Vegas, NV 89101, with 835 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers a good law firm?

Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 835 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 834 reviews and analyzed 783 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 30% of retrieved reviews, 58% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 13% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers reviews complain about?

Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers reviews in the analyzed negative sample carry the recurring concern labels unprofessional (100%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers respond to reviews?

Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers has replied to 30% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 13% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score72.8/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile50th percentileCompared with the fixed Las Vegas, NV cohort.
Tracked Google reviews835Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved834Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed783Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate30%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate58%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions13%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions28%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions16%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions5%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index99.4Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time107.4 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Las Vegas, NV

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

72.8/100

Score percentile

50th percentile

Rating percentile

100th percentile

Review-count percentile

87.5th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 783 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-a2f500a15f435904
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-1b656d21989e1ba5
Brand relationship
Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

5.7%

45 matches: 44 positive, 1 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

3.6%

28 matches: 23 positive, 0 negative, 5 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

1.1%

9 matches: 8 positive, 1 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 6, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Apr 22, 2016

Latest dated review

Mar 13, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

834 retrieved of 835 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

143

Average rating: 5.00/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.03 stars

5.00/5 in the recent period vs. 4.97/5 in the prior period

Review activity

+48 reviews

143 recent reviews vs. 95 in the prior period

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentslip and fallmedical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
6.5
Avg Review Length
227 chars
Local Guide %
14%

About

Gina Corena has devoted her career to defending injured clients. As founder of Gina Corena & Associates, she is dedicated to fighting for the rights of the people who suffer life-changing injuries in ...

Source-Backed Website Signals

Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.

Intake And Fee Signals

Free consultation stated No fee unless recovery stated 24/7 availability stated Contact form observed Phone intake observed

Languages And Practice Signals

Languages
Spanish
Practice Areas Mentioned On Site
car accident dog bite medical malpractice motorcycle accident pedestrian accident product liability slip and fall truck accident workers compensation wrongful death

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
830 (99%)
4 star
3 (<1%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (<1%)
100% positive reviews 0% negative reviews Consistency index: 99.4

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 57.5% of reviews
professionalism 28% of reviews
case results 15.6% of reviews
communication 12.5% of reviews
speed 11.2% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

● unprofessional (100%)

Questions & Answers

Q: Attorney Gina Corena and her team were a great help with our case; we highly recommend them.

A: We appreciate you placing your trust in our firm, and thank you for the kind words.

— Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers

Q: What areas of personal injury law does your firm specialize in?

A: We handle all types of personal injury cases and specialize in car accident cases.

— Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers

Q: What is the Statute of Limitations for a Car accident in Nevada? Thank you.

A: Car accident victims in Nevada have a two-year statute of limitations to pursue a claim.

— Gina Corena & Associates Car Accident Lawyers

Other Personal Injury in Las Vegas

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 834 retrieved reviews and 783 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Apr 6, 2026.
  • • 1 captured pages from the firm's website support the displayed self-reported intake signals, languages, and practice-area mentions.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 11:42:38.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-04-06 17:00:13; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:21.
  • • 835 total Google reviews tracked; 834 reviews retrieved; 783 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Review-history snapshot: Apr 6, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Las Vegas personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Nevada personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Motorcycle Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →