The Alfred Firm Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

2211 Norfolk St Ste 803, Houston, TX 77098

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

4.9
367 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

The Alfred Firm is a personal injury attorney in Houston, Texas with a 4.9-star rating across 367 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 370 reviews for this profile and analyzed 284 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 74% of retrieved reviews, 39% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 11% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 96.1.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (39%), professionalism (36%), and communication (11%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

The Alfred Firm Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (39%), professionalism (36%), and communication (11%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is The Alfred Firm legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for The Alfred Firm at 2211 Norfolk St Ste 803, Houston, TX 77098. The listing has 367 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is The Alfred Firm a good law firm?

The Alfred Firm has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 367 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 370 reviews and analyzed 284 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 74% of retrieved reviews, 39% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 11% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do The Alfred Firm reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are slow process (17%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does The Alfred Firm respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 74% of the reviews retrieved for The Alfred Firm. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 11% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score68.8/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile30.8th percentileCompared with the fixed Houston, TX cohort.
Tracked Google reviews367Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved370Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed284Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate74%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate39%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions11%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index96.1Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Houston, TX

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

68.8/100

Score percentile

30.8th percentile

Rating percentile

64.1th percentile

Review-count percentile

69.2th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 284 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-ef5d91aa1dc299ba
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-f31e8b9e23380c10
Brand relationship
The Alfred Firm

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

Outcome language (unverified)

1.8%

5 matches: 4 positive, 0 negative, 1 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

communication

1.4%

4 matches: 4 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

May 8, 2021

Latest dated review

Jul 25, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

367 retrieved of 367 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

293

Average rating: 4.93/5

Year-over-year comparison withheld

The retrieved history does not yet meet the full-window coverage and rating-count gate for a fair twelve-month comparison.

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

0%

0 replies across 8 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

60%

216 replies across 359 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidenttruck accidentslip and fallmedical malpracticeworkplace injury

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
4.6
Avg Review Length
174 chars
Local Guide %
12%

Practice Areas

Civil law attorneyInsurance attorneyLaw firmTrial attorney

About

The Alfred Firm is a premier, results-driven law firm located in Houston, Texas, focusing on personal injury, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death. Founding attorney Byron C. Alfred is a Board Cert...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 284 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
74%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
39%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
11%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
36%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
9%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
7%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 45.5 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
358 (98%)
4 star
1 (<1%)
3 star
2 (<1%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
6 (1.6%)
98% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 96.1

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 38.7% of reviews
professionalism 36.3% of reviews
communication 10.9% of reviews
case results 9.2% of reviews
expertise 8.1% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

slow process (16.7%)

Other Personal Injury in Houston

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 370 retrieved reviews and 284 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 00:10:07.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:10; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:20.
  • 367 total Google reviews tracked; 370 reviews retrieved; 284 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Houston personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Texas personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →