Arnold & Itkin Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

6009 Memorial Dr, Houston, TX 77007

4.6
1,218 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Arnold & Itkin is a personal injury attorney in Houston, Texas with a 4.6-star rating across 1,218 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 1,228 reviews for this profile and analyzed 1,033 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 46% of retrieved reviews, 49% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 12% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 77.8.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (49%), professionalism (26%), and case results (18%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, motorcycle, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Arnold & Itkin Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (49%), professionalism (26%), and case results (18%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Arnold & Itkin legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Arnold & Itkin at 6009 Memorial Dr, Houston, TX 77007. The listing has 1,218 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Arnold & Itkin a good law firm?

Arnold & Itkin has a 4.6/5 public Google rating across 1,218 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 1,228 reviews and analyzed 1,033 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 46% of retrieved reviews, 49% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 12% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Arnold & Itkin reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (16%), slow process (5%), and poor communication (90%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Arnold & Itkin respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 46% of the reviews retrieved for Arnold & Itkin. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 12% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews1,218Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved1,228Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed1,033Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate46%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate49%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions12%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index77.8Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Mar 13, 2013

Latest dated review

Aug 1, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

1,218 retrieved of 1,218 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

215

Average rating: 4.56/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

-0.04 stars

4.56/5 in the recent period vs. 4.60/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-39 reviews

215 recent reviews vs. 254 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

8%

10 replies across 132 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

44%

482 replies across 1,086 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidenttruck accidentmotorcyclemedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
6.3
Avg Review Length
262 chars
Local Guide %
20%

Practice Areas

Insurance attorneyLaw firmAttorneyLegal servicesTrial attorney

About

From the major disasters that you see on the news to the incidents that you may never hear about. When people are catastrophically injured. When people have lost the ones that they love most. When som...

Source-Backed Website Signals

Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.

Intake And Fee Signals

Free consultation stated Contingency fee mentioned No fee unless recovery stated Contact form observed Phone intake observed

Languages And Practice Signals

Languages
Spanish
Practice Areas Mentioned On Site
car accident medical malpractice truck accident wrongful death

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 1,033 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
46%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
49%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
12%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
26%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
18%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
8%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 170.4 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
1062 (87%)
4 star
24 (2%)
3 star
8 (<1%)
2 star
10 (<1%)
1 star
114 (9.4%)
89% positive reviews 11% negative reviews Consistency index: 77.8

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 48.7% of reviews
professionalism 26.1% of reviews
case results 17.7% of reviews
communication 12.1% of reviews
dedication 10.7% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (15.9%)
slow process (5.3%)
poor communication (0.9%)

Other Personal Injury in Houston

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 1,228 retrieved reviews and 1,033 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 2, 2026.
  • 1 captured pages from the firm's website support the displayed self-reported intake signals, languages, and practice-area mentions.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 00:10:07.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-02 20:35:11; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:20.
  • 1,218 total Google reviews tracked; 1,228 reviews retrieved; 1,033 text reviews analyzed.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 2, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Houston personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Texas personal injury markets → Compare Houston car accident lawyers using the same review signals → Compare Houston motorcycle accident lawyers with context-verified review evidence → Compare Houston truck accident lawyers with context-verified review evidence → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →