Schochor, Staton, Goldberg and Cardea, P.A. Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

1211 St Paul St, Baltimore, MD 21202

4.8
174 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Schochor, Staton, Goldberg and Cardea, P.A. is a personal injury attorney in Baltimore, Maryland with a 4.8-star rating across 174 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 174 reviews for this profile and analyzed 145 text reviews. The firm replies to 95% of public reviews, 97% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 15% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 89.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (97%), professionalism (41%), and compassion and care (30%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving medical malpractice and wrongful death. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews174Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved174Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed145Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate95%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate97%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions15%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index89Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

medical malpracticewrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
1.2
Avg Review Length
262 chars
Local Guide %
12%

About

Schochor, Staton, Goldberg and Cardea stands up for Baltimore families when medical errors cause harm. Our dedicated attorneys handle a range of medical malpractice cases, including surgical errors, b...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 145 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
95%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
97%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
15%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
41%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
8%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
30%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 155.1 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
162 (93%)
4 star
4 (2.3%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
8 (4.6%)
96% positive reviews 4% negative reviews Consistency index: 89

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 97.2% of reviews
professionalism 40.7% of reviews
compassion and care 29.7% of reviews
expertise 27.6% of reviews
communication 14.5% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (16.7%)

Recent Reviews

Michael Rubin
a day ago
Karl police harrasment Sherman cTHECATG-POSTS-UTUBE Local Guide
a week ago
Stella Mary

I’m incredibly grateful for the outstanding support and dedication my attorney provided throughout my case. From start to yet still ongoing , they were not only highly professional and knowledgeable, but also genuinely compassionate and supportive during a very stressful time for me and my family. ...

a week ago
Liir I. Local Guide

Someone called me from their lawfirm and after explaining what happened to my Father, they told me that the medical malpractice case wouldn't be worth filing. Very displeased with this. Who says something like that?

3 weeks ago
marissa caniano

James Cardea is truly the best. The way he interacts with his clients it is no question that he deeply cares about his work and helping others. Could not recommend him more

a month ago

Questions & Answers

Q: Do you handle non medical malpractice cases?

A: I have no idea I do know they handle medical malpractice

— Robin 1125

Other Personal Injury in Baltimore

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 174 retrieved reviews and 145 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 14:52:16.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 14:57:16.
  • 174 total Google reviews tracked; 174 reviews retrieved; 145 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 14:52:16, reviews: 2026-04-02 14:54:25, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:28.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Baltimore personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews