Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 12, 2026

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

1650 Market Street One Liberty Place, 52nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103

4.7 · 283 Google reviews

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 72.8 / 100
Within-market percentile
60.5th percentile
Evidence depth
Strong evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. is a personal injury attorney in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with a 4.7-star rating across 283 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 283 reviews for this profile and analyzed 259 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 92% of retrieved reviews, 71% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 26% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 85.7.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (71%), professionalism (46%), and communication (26%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (71%), professionalism (46%), and communication (26%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. legitimate?

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. is listed on Google as a public business profile at 1650 Market Street One Liberty Place, 52nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103, with 283 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. a good law firm?

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. has a 4.7/5 public Google rating across 283 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 283 reviews and analyzed 259 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 92% of retrieved reviews, 71% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 26% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. reviews complain about?

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. reviews in the analyzed negative sample carry the recurring concern labels unprofessional (17%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. respond to reviews?

Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. has replied to 92% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 26% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score72.8/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile60.5th percentileCompared with the fixed Philadelphia, PA cohort.
Tracked Google reviews283Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved283Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed259Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate92%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate71%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions26%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions46%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions21%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions21%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index85.7Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time134 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Philadelphia, PA

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

72.8/100

Score percentile

60.5th percentile

Rating percentile

26.3th percentile

Review-count percentile

63.2th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 259 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-5ac6c8bac8503800
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-55c4280b24507bfd
Brand relationship
Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C.

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcycleslip and fallmedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful deathproduct liability

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2.8
Avg Review Length
406 chars
Local Guide %
17%

Practice Areas

Law firmTrial attorney

About

Saltz Mongeluzzi & Bendesky (SMB) is widely regarded as one of the country’s most dominant and successful personal injury law firms, securing many record-setting settlements and verdicts in Philadelph...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
257 (91%)
4 star
5 (1.8%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
1 (<1%)
1 star
20 (7.1%)
93% positive reviews 7% negative reviews Consistency index: 85.7

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 71% of reviews
professionalism 45.6% of reviews
communication 25.9% of reviews
dedication 22% of reviews
compassion and care 21.2% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

● unprofessional (16.7%)

Other Personal Injury in Philadelphia

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 283 retrieved reviews and 259 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:45:31Z.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:31:16Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:54.
  • • 283 total Google reviews tracked; 283 reviews retrieved; 259 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Philadelphia personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Pennsylvania personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →