1617 John F Kennedy Blvd Suite 355D, Philadelphia, PA 19103
Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.
Cousin Benny is a personal injury attorney in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with a 4.9-star rating across 143 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 143 reviews for this profile and analyzed 94 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 66% of retrieved reviews, 22% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 9% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 89.4.
The most common review themes are professionalism (30%), explicit recommendation (22%), and compassion and care (13%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are professionalism (30%), explicit recommendation (22%), and compassion and care (13%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Cousin Benny at 1617 John F Kennedy Blvd Suite 355D, Philadelphia, PA 19103. The listing has 143 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Cousin Benny has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 143 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 143 reviews and analyzed 94 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 66% of retrieved reviews, 22% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 9% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (25%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Public review data shows an owner reply on 66% of the reviews retrieved for Cousin Benny. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 9% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 64/100 | Minimum evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 23.7th percentile | Compared with the fixed Philadelphia, PA cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 143 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 143 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 94 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 66% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 22% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 9% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Consistency index | 89.4 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
64/100
Score percentile
23.7th percentile
Rating percentile
78.9th percentile
Review-count percentile
28.9th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
Not scored
Minimum evidence from 94 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
4.3%
4 matches: 4 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Jan 18, 2019
Latest dated review
Mar 25, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
143 retrieved of 143 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
32
Average rating: 5.00/5
Average rating
+0.07 stars
5.00/5 in the recent period vs. 4.93/5 in the prior period
Review activity
+3 reviews
32 recent reviews vs. 29 in the prior period
Replies to 1–3-star reviews
40%
2 replies across 5 retrieved low-star reviews
Replies to 4–5-star reviews
56%
78 replies across 138 retrieved high-star reviews
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
Look, we're not your average car accident attorneys. We're the damn good lawyers you want in your corner when you've been in a car wreck. Serving clients throughout the Philadelphia area, especially i...
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Based on analysis of 94 text reviews in the current build.
Q: why haven't I heard from Ben hoffman if your my Attorney.Why am I leaving you message after
A: Hi Marcus, I'm very sorry, but I do not have any voicemails from you. Please feel free to call me at my office this morning or call or text me on my cell (which I provided you when we first spoke) and I'd be happy to answer any questions you may have. I will try to reach you this morning as well. ...
— Cousin Benny