Saiontz & Kirk Personal Injury Lawyers Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

3 S Frederick St Unit 900, Baltimore, MD 21202

4.4
1,247 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Saiontz & Kirk Personal Injury Lawyers is a personal injury attorney in Baltimore, Maryland with a 4.4-star rating across 1,247 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 1,247 reviews for this profile and analyzed 746 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 29% of retrieved reviews, 39% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 18% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is mixed based on a consistency index of 55.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (39%), case results (25%), and professionalism (24%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, medical malpractice, and workplace injury. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Saiontz & Kirk Personal Injury Lawyers Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (39%), case results (25%), and professionalism (24%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Saiontz & Kirk Personal Injury Lawyers legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Saiontz & Kirk Personal Injury Lawyers at 3 S Frederick St Unit 900, Baltimore, MD 21202. The listing has 1,247 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Saiontz & Kirk Personal Injury Lawyers a good law firm?

Saiontz & Kirk Personal Injury Lawyers has a 4.4/5 public Google rating across 1,247 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 1,247 reviews and analyzed 746 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 29% of retrieved reviews, 39% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 18% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Saiontz & Kirk Personal Injury Lawyers reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (28%), poor communication (4%), and slow process (1%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Saiontz & Kirk Personal Injury Lawyers respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 29% of the reviews retrieved for Saiontz & Kirk Personal Injury Lawyers. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 18% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews1,247Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved1,247Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed746Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate29%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate39%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions18%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index55Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 3, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Oct 20, 2014

Latest dated review

Jul 31, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

1,247 retrieved of 1,247 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

169

Average rating: 4.57/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.17 stars

4.57/5 in the recent period vs. 4.40/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-12 reviews

169 recent reviews vs. 181 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

14%

26 replies across 185 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

28%

298 replies across 1,062 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcyclemedical malpracticeworkplace injurywrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
5.2
Avg Review Length
259 chars
Local Guide %
26%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyMedical lawyerTrial attorney

About

For over 50 years, the Maryland personal injury lawyers at Saiontz & Kirk, P.A. have helped 114,000+ families recover over $1.3 billion dollars in settlements. No other personal injury law firms in Ma...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 746 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
29%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
39%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
18%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
24%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
25%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 92.5 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
967 (78%)
4 star
95 (7.6%)
3 star
20 (1.6%)
2 star
19 (1.5%)
1 star
146 (12%)
79% positive reviews 19% negative reviews Consistency index: 55

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 38.7% of reviews
case results 24.9% of reviews
professionalism 24.1% of reviews
communication 18% of reviews
speed 10.6% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (28.1%)
poor communication (3.8%)
slow process (1.2%)

Other Personal Injury in Baltimore

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 1,247 retrieved reviews and 746 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 3, 2026.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-03 09:44:12.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-03 09:44:13; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-03 09:45:44.
  • 1,247 total Google reviews tracked; 1,247 reviews retrieved; 746 text reviews analyzed.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 3, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 09:57:09 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Baltimore personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Maryland personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →