Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 3, 2026

Ridder Law - Denver Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

1575 Race St, Denver, CO 80206

5 · 201 Google reviews

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 84.9 / 100
Within-market percentile
90.6th percentile
Evidence depth
Moderate evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

Ridder Law - Denver is a personal injury attorney in Denver, Colorado with a 5.0-star rating across 201 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 201 reviews for this profile and analyzed 192 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 63% of retrieved reviews, 83% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 38% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 97.9.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (83%), communication (38%), and case results (33%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Ridder Law - Denver review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

Ridder Law - Denver reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (83%), communication (38%), and case results (33%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Ridder Law - Denver legitimate?

Ridder Law - Denver is listed on Google as a public business profile at 1575 Race St, Denver, CO 80206, with 201 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Ridder Law - Denver a good law firm?

Ridder Law - Denver has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 201 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 201 reviews and analyzed 192 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 63% of retrieved reviews, 83% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 38% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Ridder Law - Denver reviews complain about?

Ridder Law - Denver reviews show no recurring complaint category in the current analyzed sample. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Ridder Law - Denver respond to reviews?

Ridder Law - Denver has replied to 63% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 38% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score84.9/100Moderate evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile90.6th percentileCompared with the fixed Denver, CO cohort.
Tracked Google reviews201Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved201Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed192Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate63%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate83%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions38%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions23%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions33%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions6%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index97.9Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time102.7 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Denver, CO

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

84.9/100

Score percentile

90.6th percentile

Rating percentile

100th percentile

Review-count percentile

43.8th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Moderate evidence from 192 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-475d612f8795263d
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-8b059be4de212466
Brand relationship
Ridder Law - Denver

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

9.9%

19 matches: 19 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

5.7%

11 matches: 9 positive, 0 negative, 2 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

3.1%

6 matches: 6 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 3, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Oct 4, 2022

Latest dated review

Jul 31, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

201 retrieved of 201 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

64

Average rating: 4.94/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

-0.02 stars

4.94/5 in the recent period vs. 4.96/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-11 reviews

64 recent reviews vs. 75 in the prior period

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcyclemedical malpractice

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
4.1
Avg Review Length
276 chars
Local Guide %
18%

Practice Areas

Law firmLegal services

About

Navigating an accident claim is stressful. If you need a dedicated Denver personal injury attorney who treats you like a person, not a case number, Ridder Law is here to help. Led by Theodore Ridder, ...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
197 (98%)
4 star
3 (1.5%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (<1%)
100% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 97.9

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 83.3% of reviews
communication 37.5% of reviews
case results 32.8% of reviews
professionalism 23.4% of reviews
speed 16.1% of reviews

Other Personal Injury in Denver

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 201 retrieved reviews and 192 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 3, 2026.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-03 09:44:12.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-08-03 09:44:12; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-03 09:45:44.
  • • 201 total Google reviews tracked; 201 reviews retrieved; 192 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Review-history snapshot: Aug 3, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 09:57:09 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Denver personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Colorado personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Motorcycle Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →