Chalat Hatten & Banker PC Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

1600 Broadway Unit 1920, Denver, CO 80202

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 12, 2026.

4.9
82 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Chalat Hatten & Banker PC is a personal injury attorney in Denver, Colorado with a 4.9-star rating across 82 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 82 reviews for this profile and analyzed 78 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 58% of retrieved reviews, 91% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 30% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 98.7.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (91%), professionalism (56%), and communication (30%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Chalat Hatten & Banker PC Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (91%), professionalism (56%), and communication (30%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Chalat Hatten & Banker PC legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Chalat Hatten & Banker PC at 1600 Broadway Unit 1920, Denver, CO 80202. The listing has 82 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Chalat Hatten & Banker PC a good law firm?

Chalat Hatten & Banker PC has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 82 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 82 reviews and analyzed 78 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 58% of retrieved reviews, 91% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 30% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Chalat Hatten & Banker PC reviews complain about?

The current analyzed sample does not contain a recurring complaint category for Chalat Hatten & Banker PC. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Chalat Hatten & Banker PC respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 58% of the reviews retrieved for Chalat Hatten & Banker PC. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 30% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score78.3/100Minimum evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile53.1th percentileCompared with the fixed Denver, CO cohort.
Tracked Google reviews82Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved82Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed78Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate58%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate91%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions30%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index98.7Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Denver, CO

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

78.3/100

Score percentile

53.1th percentile

Rating percentile

68.8th percentile

Review-count percentile

18.8th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Minimum evidence from 78 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-24ee6e702e95768d
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-7f347d0abac8b8e2
Brand relationship
Chalat Hatten & Banker PC

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentmotorcycleslip and fallmedical malpracticewrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.7
Avg Review Length
442 chars
Local Guide %
22%

About

The firm was established in 1983. At Chalat Hatten & Banker, we are committed to helping you find relief during the most challenging and overwhelming moments of your life. If you were involved in a c...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 78 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
58%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
91%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
30%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
56%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
28%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
27%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 167.2 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
80 (98%)
4 star
0 (0%)
3 star
1 (1.2%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (1.2%)
99% positive reviews Consistency index: 98.7

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 91% of reviews
professionalism 56.4% of reviews
communication 29.5% of reviews
case results 28.2% of reviews
expertise 28.2% of reviews

Other Personal Injury in Denver

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 82 retrieved reviews and 78 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:44:53Z.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:28:18Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:10:01.
  • 82 total Google reviews tracked; 82 reviews retrieved; 78 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Denver personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Colorado personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Compare this office in the Medical Malpractice cohort → Compare this office in the Truck Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →