1801 Market St #700, Philadelphia, PA 19103
Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.
Rand Spear: The Accident Lawyer is a personal injury attorney in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with a 4.7-star rating across 756 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 762 reviews for this profile and analyzed 594 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 77% of retrieved reviews, 40% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 11% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is fairly consistent based on a consistency index of 82.
The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (40%), professionalism (24%), and case results (23%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, motorcycle, slip and fall, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (40%), professionalism (24%), and case results (23%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Rand Spear: The Accident Lawyer at 1801 Market St #700, Philadelphia, PA 19103. The listing has 756 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Rand Spear: The Accident Lawyer has a 4.7/5 public Google rating across 756 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 762 reviews and analyzed 594 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 77% of retrieved reviews, 40% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 11% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (16%), poor communication (4%), and slow process (2%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Public review data shows an owner reply on 77% of the reviews retrieved for Rand Spear: The Accident Lawyer. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 11% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 61.3/100 | Strong evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 21.1th percentile | Compared with the fixed Philadelphia, PA cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 756 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 762 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 594 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 77% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 40% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 11% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Consistency index | 82 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
61.3/100
Score percentile
21.1th percentile
Rating percentile
26.3th percentile
Review-count percentile
94.7th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
Not scored
Strong evidence from 594 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
4.2%
25 matches: 13 positive, 0 negative, 12 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.
3.9%
23 matches: 20 positive, 3 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
2.5%
15 matches: 12 positive, 3 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 2, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Sep 1, 2015
Latest dated review
Jul 30, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
756 retrieved of 756 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
164
Average rating: 4.82/5
Average rating
+0.14 stars
4.82/5 in the recent period vs. 4.68/5 in the prior period
Review activity
+48 reviews
164 recent reviews vs. 116 in the prior period
Replies to 1–3-star reviews
41%
26 replies across 63 retrieved low-star reviews
Replies to 4–5-star reviews
80%
555 replies across 693 retrieved high-star reviews
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
"We fight and win for our clients! Don’t settle for less, demand Rand and the Spear Greenfield legal team. No one will work harder for you than Rand Spear and his team of aggressive trial lawyers. The...
Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Based on analysis of 594 text reviews in the current build.
Q: I had a slip and fall in 2018 and 2019 at my work place. Now I have problems with my back. Do I have any recourse ?
A: Yes,but to be certain,reach out to "several" attorney's and not just one,to be certain. Any documentation would be most helpful of course.
— Rob C.
Q: Yes they do.You must be more descriptive concerning your situation though.Explain in detail so the Atty. Can have a better idea in which to proceed with your potential case.
A: What is the question
— christine Janaitis
Q: My daughter has been appealing her disability claim for years. Current lawyer keeps telling her to wait a year before appealing again. This doesn't sound right to me. She lives in Laureldale, PA. Can you help her?
A: Someone at rand spear could appeal it
— Lauren Smith
Q: Can I sue for a family member stealing my Xbox and pawning it ?
A: They probably wouldn’t be worth it. You will probably waste more money with the lawyer than it’s actually worth. File a small claim.
— Joe Brown
Q: Do you handle social security appeal s
A: Yes
— tamekia herring
Q: do you do disability claims
A: No. Accident
— Angela Bowers
Q: I fell down a couple of outside stairs on 12/13/2019. I am getting rotatorcuff surgery on 1/20/2020 i also live in Coatesville PA
A: What is your question?
— Rob C.
Q: Was a passenger in a car that hydroplanef and hit a cardrail I went to the hospital with injuries. Missed a couple days of work who is responsible for my bills and what am I entitled to I'm still in pain who will pay my bills.
A: Call the office and Explain the situation.
— Joe Brown
Q: If I take out a claim with Mr. Spear's Law Firm will this interfere with my social security?
A: Call and ask
— Margaret Brownsweiget
Q: Does your law firm handle cases in NJ
A: Yes
— Col. Blake
Q: I had a case was a child called when I was 19 20 someone bush me off the phone no mail no nothing now 30 years old now I try calling again this case happened in 2004 why no one told me of contact me bullshit
A: Go there and speak to them face to face..
— Dame Carter
Q: Does rand spears handle product safety cases.
A: Yes.
— Col. Blake
Q: Yes I have a question, I was told that I would need a lawyer to retrieve my mugshots from a legal incident back in 1999. I wanted to now if you could or a referred lawyer could assist me and how much would the fee be ?
A: Not sure make calls get different quotes
— Margaret Brownsweiget
Q: Where do l go for court whats the address
A: It depends on if you're going for arbitration or court because arbitration didnt work out
— vickie miles
Q: Does Rand Spear and his team do medical malpractice
A: Yes
— Kevin Bowers