Puget Law Group Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

901 5th Ave Ste 3200, Seattle, WA 98164

4.9
165 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Puget Law Group is a criminal justice attorney in Seattle, Washington with a 4.9-star rating across 165 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 165 reviews for this profile and analyzed 156 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 66% of retrieved reviews, 80% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 27% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 96.8.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (80%), professionalism (40%), and communication (27%). Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Puget Law Group Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (80%), professionalism (40%), and communication (27%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Puget Law Group legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Puget Law Group at 901 5th Ave Ste 3200, Seattle, WA 98164. The listing has 165 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Puget Law Group a good law firm?

Puget Law Group has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 165 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 165 reviews and analyzed 156 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 66% of retrieved reviews, 80% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 27% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Puget Law Group reviews complain about?

The current analyzed sample does not contain a recurring complaint category for Puget Law Group. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Puget Law Group respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 66% of the reviews retrieved for Puget Law Group. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 27% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews165Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved165Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed156Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate66%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate80%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions27%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index96.8Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Aug 3, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Sep 26, 2020

Latest dated review

Jul 22, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

165 retrieved of 165 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

67

Average rating: 5.00/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.30 stars

5.00/5 in the recent period vs. 4.70/5 in the prior period

Review activity

+34 reviews

67 recent reviews vs. 33 in the prior period

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2.2
Avg Review Length
380 chars
Local Guide %
18%

Practice Areas

Law firmAttorneyLegal servicesPersonal injury attorneyTrial attorney

About

If you are charged with DUI, a crime of Domestic Violence, or any other criminal matter – or currently facing a pending criminal charge – you know that it is an experience filled with fear and uncerta...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 156 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
66%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
80%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
27%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
40%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
8%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
14%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 69.3 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
162 (98%)
4 star
0 (0%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
2 (1.2%)
98% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 96.8

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 79.5% of reviews
professionalism 40.4% of reviews
communication 26.9% of reviews
compassion and care 13.5% of reviews
dedication 12.8% of reviews

Other Personal Injury in Seattle

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 165 retrieved reviews and 156 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Aug 3, 2026.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-03 09:44:12.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-08-03 09:44:12; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-03 09:45:44.
  • 165 total Google reviews tracked; 165 reviews retrieved; 156 text reviews analyzed.
  • Review-history snapshot: Aug 3, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 09:57:09 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Seattle personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Washington personal injury markets → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →