Multi-location law firm review analysis
Law Leaderboard tracks 7,608 public Google reviews across 4 distinct Moseley Collins Law office profiles in 4 cities. Their review-count-weighted rating is 4.96/5. The table below shows why the office-level evidence matters before treating one brand name as one uniform experience.
Quick verdict from public review data
Moseley Collins Law's 4 tracked office profiles have a 4.96/5 review-count-weighted public Google rating across 7,608 reviews. The office ratings range from 4.9-5.0/5, so the office table is more useful than a single brand-wide label. Public feedback can support a shortlist, but it cannot establish legal ability, likely case results, or fit for a particular matter.
Seattle, Washington has the highest office rating in this dataset at 5/5 across 1,897 tracked reviews. Sacramento, California has the lowest at 4.9/5 across 3,275 tracked reviews. This range describes the captured office profiles only and does not prove why experiences differ.
Across retrieved reviews, the weighted owner-reply signal for the tracked Moseley Collins Law offices is 71%. This measures public responses to Google reviews, not communication with clients during a case.
Across the analyzed office samples, the most prominent recurring concern labels are unprofessional (15%). These are weighted review-text signals, not verified complaint counts or findings of misconduct.
Law Leaderboard can confirm 4 public Google Business listings connected by the same firm website domain, moseleycollins.com. This does not independently verify every lawyer's license, disciplinary history, insurance, or fit for a specific case. Verify the office and attorneys with the relevant state bar before hiring.
Ordered by tracked public review volume. Ratings and counts are office-specific; the response and recommendation columns use the review sample available for each profile.
| Office | Rating | Tracked | Analyzed | Owner replies | Recommend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacramento, California 980 9th St 16th floor, Sacramento, CA 95814 | 4.9/5 | 3,275 | 2,381 | 61% | 16% |
| Seattle, Washington 701 5th Ave Suite 4200, Seattle, WA 98104 | 5/5 | 1,897 | 1,434 | 86% | 16% |
| Portland, Oregon 1012 SW King Ave Suite 104, Portland, OR 97205 | 5/5 | 1,734 | 1,251 | 63% | 14% |
| San Diego, California 3930 Oregon St #249, San Diego, CA 92104 | 5/5 | 702 | 512 | 98% | 15% |
The largest public review footprint in this dataset is Sacramento, California, with 3,275 tracked reviews. Volume is not the same as quality.
Weighted across the office review-text samples where each label appears.
Labels derived from analyzed negative-review text; not verified complaint filings.
Law Leaderboard tracks 7,608 public Google reviews across 4 distinct Moseley Collins Law office profiles in 4 cities. Their review-count-weighted rating is 4.96/5. The current dataset retrieved 7,153 reviews and analyzed 5,578 review texts. Read the office table because experiences and review coverage vary by location.
Law Leaderboard can confirm 4 public Google Business listings connected by the same firm website domain, moseleycollins.com. This does not independently verify every lawyer's license, disciplinary history, insurance, or fit for a specific case. Verify the office and attorneys with the relevant state bar before hiring.
Moseley Collins Law in Seattle, Washington has the highest public Google rating in this dataset at 5/5 across 1,897 tracked reviews. Ties are broken by public review volume; this is not an endorsement or a prediction of service quality.
Across the analyzed office samples, the most prominent recurring concern labels are unprofessional (15%). These are weighted review-text signals, not verified complaint counts or findings of misconduct.
Office profiles are joined only when they share the configured firm website domain, then deduplicated by Google place ID or address. Aggregate ratings are weighted by each office's tracked review count. Response signals are weighted by retrieved reviews, and text-derived themes are weighted by analyzed review texts. See the national review benchmark for cross-market context and the full methodology for metric definitions.