Claimed Google Business Profile Data refreshed Aug 12, 2026

Moseley Collins Law Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

656 S Los Angeles St #410, Los Angeles, CA 90014

5 · 1,176 Google reviews
Compare all tracked Moseley Collins Law locations

Review evidence score

LAW LEADERBOARD · REVIEW EVIDENCE SCORE · FIXED COHORT · 67.1 / 100
Within-market percentile
26.7th percentile
Evidence depth
Strong evidence

Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.

Moseley Collins Law is a personal injury attorney in Los Angeles, California with a 5.0-star rating across 1,176 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 1,175 reviews for this profile and analyzed 866 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 88% of retrieved reviews, 14% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 4% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 98.2.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (14%), speed (12%), and professionalism (12%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving medical malpractice and wrongful death. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Moseley Collins Law review summary, answered from data.

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

Moseley Collins Law reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (14%), speed (12%), and professionalism (12%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Moseley Collins Law legitimate?

Moseley Collins Law is listed on Google as a public business profile at 656 S Los Angeles St #410, Los Angeles, CA 90014, with 1,176 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Moseley Collins Law a good law firm?

Moseley Collins Law has a 5.0/5 public Google rating across 1,176 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 1,175 reviews and analyzed 866 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 88% of retrieved reviews, 14% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 4% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Moseley Collins Law reviews complain about?

Moseley Collins Law reviews show no recurring complaint category in the current analyzed sample. That does not prove that no client has complained; review coverage is incomplete and changes over time.

Does Moseley Collins Law respond to reviews?

Moseley Collins Law has replied to 88% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 4% of analyzed review texts.

Could experiences vary by location?

Yes. This evidence covers the Los Angeles, California office. Compare all tracked Moseley Collins Law offices before generalizing this location's rating, praise, or concern signals to the wider brand.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score67.1/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile26.7th percentileCompared with the fixed Los Angeles, CA cohort.
Tracked Google reviews1,176Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved1,175Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed866Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate88%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate14%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions4%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Professionalism mentions12%Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism.
Case-results mentions4%Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results.
Compassion mentions8%Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care.
Consistency index98.2Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.
Average owner response time91.4 daysMean delay between a public review and the owner reply.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Los Angeles, CA

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

67.1/100

Score percentile

26.7th percentile

Rating percentile

100th percentile

Review-count percentile

86.7th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 866 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-92bf55d65c3a3ff3
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-moseley-collins-law

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

No office-level theme result passed every current publication gate. This is not evidence that reviewers never mentioned these topics.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

medical malpracticewrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
41.5
Avg Review Length
147 chars
Local Guide %
20%

About

Moseley Collins Law focuses on medical malpractice, birth injury, paralysis, and and other catastrophic injury cases like car accidents. Our experienced attorneys are dedicated to fighting for the rig...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Rating Distribution

5 star
1154 (98%)
4 star
16 (1.4%)
3 star
4 (<1%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
2 (<1%)
99% positive reviews 0% negative reviews Consistency index: 98.2

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 14.2% of reviews
speed 11.7% of reviews
professionalism 11.5% of reviews
compassion and care 7.5% of reviews
dedication 4.8% of reviews

Other Personal Injury in Los Angeles

Provenance

Sources, freshness, and limitations.

Sources

  • • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • • 1,175 retrieved reviews and 866 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • • Business profile last collected: 2026-08-09 23:44:48Z.
  • • Review records last collected: 2026-08-11 20:39:11Z; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-12 08:09:58.
  • • 1,176 total Google reviews tracked; 1,175 reviews retrieved; 866 text reviews analyzed.
  • • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • • Methodology version: review-evidence-v1.0.0. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-12 00:00:00Z; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Los Angeles personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore California personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →