Multi-location law firm review analysis
Law Leaderboard tracks 1,170 public Google reviews across 4 distinct Monge & Associates office profiles in 4 cities. Their review-count-weighted rating is 4.90/5. The table below shows why the office-level evidence matters before treating one brand name as one uniform experience.
Quick verdict from public review data
Monge & Associates's 4 tracked office profiles have a 4.90/5 review-count-weighted public Google rating across 1,170 reviews. The office ratings range from 4.9-4.9/5, so the office table is more useful than a single brand-wide label. Public feedback can support a shortlist, but it cannot establish legal ability, likely case results, or fit for a particular matter.
Atlanta, Georgia has the highest office rating in this dataset at 4.9/5 across 626 tracked reviews. Atlanta, Georgia has the lowest at 4.9/5 across 626 tracked reviews. This range describes the captured office profiles only and does not prove why experiences differ.
Across retrieved reviews, the weighted owner-reply signal for the tracked Monge & Associates offices is 94%. This measures public responses to Google reviews, not communication with clients during a case.
Across the analyzed office samples, the most prominent recurring concern labels are unprofessional (20%), low settlement (9%), passed around (9%). These are weighted review-text signals, not verified complaint counts or findings of misconduct.
Law Leaderboard can confirm 4 public Google Business listings connected by the same firm website domain, becauseyouwanttowin.com. This does not independently verify every lawyer's license, disciplinary history, insurance, or fit for a specific case. Verify the office and attorneys with the relevant state bar before hiring.
Ordered by tracked public review volume. Ratings and counts are office-specific; the response and recommendation columns use the review sample available for each profile.
| Office | Rating | Tracked | Analyzed | Owner replies | Recommend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta, Georgia 1718-1720 Peachtree St NE Suite 426, Atlanta, GA 30309 | 4.9/5 | 626 | 358 | 94% | 22% |
| Seattle, Washington 509 Olive Wy Suite 1361, Seattle, WA 98101 | 4.9/5 | 249 | 146 | 96% | 8% |
| Denver, Colorado 825 Speer Blvd Suite# 6, Denver, CO 80218 | 4.9/5 | 241 | 124 | 93% | 22% |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota 331 2nd Ave S Suite 455, Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 4.9/5 | 54 | 40 | 100% | 15% |
The largest public review footprint in this dataset is Atlanta, Georgia, with 626 tracked reviews. Volume is not the same as quality.
Weighted across the office review-text samples where each label appears.
Labels derived from analyzed negative-review text; not verified complaint filings.
Law Leaderboard tracks 1,170 public Google reviews across 4 distinct Monge & Associates office profiles in 4 cities. Their review-count-weighted rating is 4.90/5. The current dataset retrieved 1,129 reviews and analyzed 668 review texts. Read the office table because experiences and review coverage vary by location.
Law Leaderboard can confirm 4 public Google Business listings connected by the same firm website domain, becauseyouwanttowin.com. This does not independently verify every lawyer's license, disciplinary history, insurance, or fit for a specific case. Verify the office and attorneys with the relevant state bar before hiring.
Monge & Associates Injury and Accident Attorneys in Atlanta, Georgia has the highest public Google rating in this dataset at 4.9/5 across 626 tracked reviews. Ties are broken by public review volume; this is not an endorsement or a prediction of service quality.
Across the analyzed office samples, the most prominent recurring concern labels are unprofessional (20%), low settlement (9%), passed around (9%). These are weighted review-text signals, not verified complaint counts or findings of misconduct.
Office profiles are joined only when they share the configured firm website domain, then deduplicated by Google place ID or address. Aggregate ratings are weighted by each office's tracked review count. Response signals are weighted by retrieved reviews, and text-derived themes are weighted by analyzed review texts. See the national review benchmark for cross-market context and the full methodology for metric definitions.