2500 W Loop S #450, Houston, TX 77027
Review evidence score
Compares public-review evidence only. Not a measure of legal ability or outcomes.
Mokaram Injury Lawyers is a personal injury attorney in Houston, Texas with a 4.9-star rating across 949 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 944 reviews for this profile and analyzed 781 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 71% of retrieved reviews, 50% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 12% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 95.
The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (50%), professionalism (25%), and communication (12%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, motorcycle, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.
Review verdict
These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.
Mokaram Injury Lawyers reviews most often praise explicit recommendation (50%), professionalism (25%), and communication (12%) in the analyzed sample. These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.
Mokaram Injury Lawyers is listed on Google as a public business profile at 2500 W Loop S #450, Houston, TX 77027, with 949 tracked Google reviews, and the listing is marked as claimed on Google. A public listing does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.
Mokaram Injury Lawyers has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 949 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 944 reviews and analyzed 781 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 71% of retrieved reviews, 50% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 12% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.
Mokaram Injury Lawyers reviews in the analyzed negative sample carry the recurring concern labels unprofessional (15%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.
Mokaram Injury Lawyers has replied to 71% of the reviews retrieved for this profile, according to public review data. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 12% of analyzed review texts.
Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.
| Metric | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Review Evidence Score | 71.5/100 | Strong evidence; public-review evidence only. |
| Within-market score percentile | 54.8th percentile | Compared with the fixed Houston, TX cohort. |
| Tracked Google reviews | 949 | Public review count currently visible on the profile. |
| Reviews retrieved | 944 | Review records stored in the current build. |
| Text reviews analyzed | 781 | Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics. |
| Owner response rate | 71% | Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply. |
| Explicit recommendation rate | 50% | Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm. |
| Communication mentions | 12% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication. |
| Professionalism mentions | 25% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention professionalism. |
| Case-results mentions | 11% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention case results. |
| Compassion mentions | 7% | Share of analyzed reviews that mention compassion or care. |
| Consistency index | 95 | Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern. |
| Average owner response time | 128.1 days | Mean delay between a public review and the owner reply. |
Identity-linked office intelligence
An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.
Evidence score
71.5/100
Score percentile
54.8th percentile
Rating percentile
61.9th percentile
Review-count percentile
45.2th percentile
Owner-reply percentile
54.8th percentile
Strong evidence from 781 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.
The nearest scored offices in the same fixed market by Review Evidence Score. Proximity is descriptive, not a recommendation.
The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.
3.8%
30 matches: 29 positive, 1 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.
1.8%
14 matches: 12 positive, 0 negative, 2 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.
0.9%
7 matches: 7 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.
Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.
Historical review data
Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 6, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.
Retrieved history begins
Jan 20, 2017
Latest dated review
Mar 18, 2026
Retrieved coverage
100%
944 retrieved of 949 tracked
Recent 12-month reviews
277
Average rating: 4.92/5
Average rating
+0.05 stars
4.92/5 in the recent period vs. 4.87/5 in the prior period
Review activity
+42 reviews
277 recent reviews vs. 235 in the prior period
Replies to 1–3-star reviews
61%
17 replies across 28 retrieved low-star reviews
Replies to 4–5-star reviews
66%
606 replies across 916 retrieved high-star reviews
Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.
For over 30 years, the attorneys at Mokaram Law Firm have been the go-to firm for individuals who have been injured due to the negligent actions of another person or party. We work to help victims of ...
Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.
The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.
Provenance