Mokaram Injury Lawyers Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

2500 W Loop S #450, Houston, TX 77027

4.9
949 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Mokaram Injury Lawyers is a personal injury attorney in Houston, Texas with a 4.9-star rating across 949 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 944 reviews for this profile and analyzed 781 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 71% of retrieved reviews, 50% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 12% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 95.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (50%), professionalism (25%), and communication (12%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, truck accident, motorcycle, and medical malpractice. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Mokaram Injury Lawyers Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (50%), professionalism (25%), and communication (12%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Mokaram Injury Lawyers legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Mokaram Injury Lawyers at 2500 W Loop S #450, Houston, TX 77027. The listing has 949 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Mokaram Injury Lawyers a good law firm?

Mokaram Injury Lawyers has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 949 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 944 reviews and analyzed 781 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 71% of retrieved reviews, 50% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 12% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Mokaram Injury Lawyers reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (15%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Mokaram Injury Lawyers respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 71% of the reviews retrieved for Mokaram Injury Lawyers. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 12% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews949Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved944Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed781Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate71%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate50%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions12%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index95Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 6, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Jan 20, 2017

Latest dated review

Mar 18, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

944 retrieved of 949 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

277

Average rating: 4.92/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

+0.05 stars

4.92/5 in the recent period vs. 4.87/5 in the prior period

Review activity

+42 reviews

277 recent reviews vs. 235 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

61%

17 replies across 28 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

66%

606 replies across 916 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidenttruck accidentmotorcyclemedical malpracticewrongful death

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
7.1
Avg Review Length
188 chars
Local Guide %
15%

Practice Areas

Law firm

About

For over 30 years, the attorneys at Mokaram Law Firm have been the go-to firm for individuals who have been injured due to the negligent actions of another person or party. We work to help victims of ...

Source-Backed Website Signals

Details are shown only when captured from qualifying pages on the firm’s own website; they are self-reported website statements captured at a point in time and are not independent verification of service quality, attorney licensing, or suitability for a specific case.

Intake And Fee Signals

Contingency fee mentioned No fee unless recovery stated 24/7 availability stated Contact form observed Phone intake observed

Languages And Practice Signals

Languages
No source-backed language list captured yet.
Practice Areas Mentioned On Site
bicycle accident brain injury car accident dog bite motorcycle accident pedestrian accident slip and fall truck accident workers compensation wrongful death

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 781 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
71%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
50%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
12%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
25%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
11%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
7%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 128.1 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
904 (95%)
4 star
16 (1.7%)
3 star
5 (<1%)
2 star
11 (1.2%)
1 star
13 (1.4%)
97% positive reviews 2% negative reviews Consistency index: 95

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 50.4% of reviews
professionalism 25.4% of reviews
communication 11.8% of reviews
case results 10.6% of reviews
expertise 7.9% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (15%)

Other Personal Injury in Houston

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 944 retrieved reviews and 781 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Apr 6, 2026.
  • 1 captured pages from the firm's website support the displayed self-reported intake signals, languages, and practice-area mentions.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 00:10:07.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-04-06 17:00:02; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:20.
  • 949 total Google reviews tracked; 944 reviews retrieved; 781 text reviews analyzed.
  • Review-history snapshot: Apr 6, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Houston personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Texas personal injury markets → Compare Houston car accident lawyers using the same review signals → Compare Houston motorcycle accident lawyers with context-verified review evidence → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →