Khan Injury Law - Seattle Reviews, Ratings & Complaints

1325 4th Ave #920, Seattle, WA 98101

Public profile and review data last refreshed Aug 2, 2026.

4.9
351 Google reviews
Claimed Google Business Profile

Khan Injury Law - Seattle is a personal injury attorney in Seattle, Washington with a 4.9-star rating across 351 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 351 reviews for this profile and analyzed 330 text reviews. The firm has an owner reply on 73% of retrieved reviews, 44% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 13% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 95.5.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (44%), professionalism (22%), and communication (13%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident, slip and fall, medical malpractice, and dog bite. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Review verdict

Khan Injury Law - Seattle Review Summary and Due-Diligence Questions

These direct answers separate what the public review dataset can confirm from licensing, disciplinary, and case-fit questions that require independent verification.

What clients praise

The strongest recurring praise signals in the analyzed review sample are explicit recommendation (44%), professionalism (22%), and communication (13%). These percentages describe text labels in the captured sample, not independently verified service claims.

Is Khan Injury Law - Seattle legitimate?

Law Leaderboard can confirm that this page represents a public Google Business listing for Khan Injury Law - Seattle at 1325 4th Ave #920, Seattle, WA 98101. The listing has 351 tracked Google reviews and is marked as claimed on Google. This does not independently verify attorney licensing, disciplinary history, insurance, or eligibility to handle a specific matter; check the relevant state bar and speak with the firm before hiring.

Is Khan Injury Law - Seattle a good law firm?

Khan Injury Law - Seattle has a 4.9/5 public Google rating across 351 tracked reviews. Law Leaderboard retrieved 351 reviews and analyzed 330 review texts for this profile. In that sample, the firm has an owner reply on 73% of retrieved reviews, 44% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 13% of analyzed reviews. These are public feedback signals, not a legal endorsement or prediction of case results.

What do Khan Injury Law - Seattle reviews complain about?

The recurring concern labels found in the analyzed negative-review sample are unprofessional (50%). Percentages describe the relevant review sample and should be read with the rating distribution and coverage notes below.

Does Khan Injury Law - Seattle respond to reviews?

Public review data shows an owner reply on 73% of the reviews retrieved for Khan Injury Law - Seattle. This measures responses to public reviews, not communication with clients during a case. Communication appears in 13% of analyzed review texts.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Review Evidence Score70.3/100Strong evidence; public-review evidence only.
Within-market score percentile42.3th percentileCompared with the fixed Seattle, WA cohort.
Tracked Google reviews351Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved351Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed330Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate73%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate44%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions13%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index95.5Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Identity-linked office intelligence

Where This Office Sits in Seattle, WA

An office’s within-market percentile shows how its Review Evidence Score compares with the other profiles in that market. It is a relative position, not a probability, quality rating, or prediction. The score and percentile reflect public-review evidence only—not legal skill, licensing, case outcomes, misconduct, or suitability.

Compare offices side by side →

Evidence score

70.3/100

Score percentile

42.3th percentile

Rating percentile

65.4th percentile

Review-count percentile

84.6th percentile

Owner-reply percentile

Not scored

Evidence strength and entity relationship

Strong evidence from 330 analyzed review texts. The identity match uses exact source IDs in the private graph; those provider IDs are not exposed here.

Law Leaderboard office ID
llb-office-ad0824246f36746b
Law Leaderboard brand ID
llb-brand-0e90d62cf9bbac91
Brand relationship
Khan Injury Law - Seattle

QA-published themes for this office

The published themes are communication, responsiveness or delays, and outcome language. Theme prevalence is calculated only for offices whose theme result passed minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates. Outcome language reflects an unverified claim in a review; it is not independent confirmation of what happened.

communication

4.2%

14 matches: 14 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 96%.

Outcome language (unverified)

3.0%

10 matches: 4 positive, 0 negative, 6 neutral. Precision in external QA: 82%.

responsiveness delays

2.4%

8 matches: 8 positive, 0 negative. Precision in external QA: 95%.

Release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4. Trend fields remain withheld until the separate multi-snapshot publication gate is met.

Historical review data

Review Activity and Response Detail

Public-review aggregates captured through Apr 6, 2026. These figures describe the retrieved history, not a live feed.

Method: review-trends-v1.0.0

Retrieved history begins

Dec 6, 2016

Latest dated review

Mar 5, 2026

Retrieved coverage

100%

351 retrieved of 351 tracked

Recent 12-month reviews

70

Average rating: 4.94/5

Year-over-year review change

Average rating

0.00 stars

4.94/5 in the recent period vs. 4.94/5 in the prior period

Review activity

-19 reviews

70 recent reviews vs. 89 in the prior period

Owner replies by rating group

Replies to 1–3-star reviews

43%

3 replies across 7 retrieved low-star reviews

Replies to 4–5-star reviews

69%

237 replies across 344 retrieved high-star reviews

Comparison gates prevent thin or incomplete review history from being presented as a trend. Review text and reviewer identities are not published in these aggregates.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accidentslip and fallmedical malpracticedog bite

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
2.9
Avg Review Length
210 chars
Local Guide %
16%

Practice Areas

Insurance attorneyLaw firmAttorneyLegal servicesTrial attorney

About

At Khan Injury Law, our personal injury attorneys in Seattle, WA, are dedicated to fighting for accident victims’ rights. If you were injured due to someone else’s negligence, our experienced legal te...

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, historical activity, and source-freshness notes. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 330 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
73%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
44%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
13%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
22%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
11%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
7%
of analyzed reviews
Average response time: 154.8 days

Rating Distribution

5 star
336 (96%)
4 star
8 (2.3%)
3 star
1 (<1%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
6 (1.7%)
99% positive reviews 1% negative reviews Consistency index: 95.5

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 43.9% of reviews
professionalism 21.8% of reviews
communication 13.3% of reviews
case results 10.9% of reviews
speed 10.3% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

unprofessional (50%)

Questions & Answers

Q: How large of a settlement should I receive for my slip and fall accident?

A: You can anticipate your compensation to range from a few thousand dollars all the way up to six figures, depending on where your slip and fall occurred and the seriousness of your injuries. Since there are so many diverse variables at play, slip and fall personal injury lawsuits are notoriously diff...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: Who is responsible for a railroad-related injury?

A: Although railroads are generally liable for incidents involving or near trains, their specific liability will vary depending on the relationship between the railroad and the injured party. Different levels of care are expected of railroads in relation to their staff, customers, and outside parties l...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: Do I have to court if I have a personal injury claim?

A: No, not always. In most circumstances, a settlement that is reasonable and fair to our client may be reached before trial, and that is what we aim to achieve. In almost all instances, the defendant's insurance coverage is used to pay out on personal injury claims. The insurance provider owes the in...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: What sort of costs can I recover in a traumatic brain injury lawsuit?

A: You are entitled to damages, or financial compensation, to cover all TBI-related expenses. It also covers compensation for less obvious losses like a lifelong handicap, the inability to care for a loved one, the loss of the ability to parent, and pain and suffering. These costs include inpatient car...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: I wasn’t in a crosswalk when I was hit by a car. Do I still have a case?

A: It's possible. Even if you were breaking the law when the collision happened, the driver who hit you was still required to exercise reasonable caution around pedestrians. Your collision may have been caused by additional factors, such as the driver's inattention or exhaustion. Because of this, you r...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: What if I can’t afford to pay for legal representation?

A: The majority of personal injury lawyers work on a contingency basis. This implies that unless a recovery is made on your behalf, the lawyers won't be paid for their services. Most personal injury lawyers won't demand a retainer from you in advance to secure their services, and many will even advance...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: What are the most common brain injuries?

A: The most typical type of traumatic brain injury in the US is a mild concussion. Stricter safety regulations have been implemented in recent years to better safeguard athletes, particularly football players, due to worries over the rising frequency of concussions in collegiate and professional sports...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: Do I have to go to court to receive a settlement for my injuries?

A: No. Although each case is unique, the majority of disputes are resolved out of court by the insurance company. Before a lawsuit is even filed, claims are frequently resolved with the insurance provider.

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: What is vicarious liability for a truck accident?

A: The legal concept of vicarious responsibility states that one person may be held accountable for another's negligent actions. This idea frequently arises in the context of an employer being required to make up for the damage an employee created. For instance, a trucking business may be responsible f...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: How do I determine the value of my totaled motorcycle after a Washington accident?

A: You will receive the motorcycle's true monetary worth if it is declared a total loss. If you consider your motorcycle to be a personal investment, you need make sure your insurance policy has sufficient coverage to protect that investment. Otherwise, the free market would almost always decide that y...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: How can an attorney settle my car accident claim with my insurer?

A: Your chances of obtaining the money you want from your claim could be threatened by a number of factors. If an insurance provider notices that you are not represented by counsel, they might try to: forcing you to rapidly accept for less money than you need Send out a claims adjuster who will observ...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: I was injured in an accident. Can I recover decreased future income?

A: You might be able to recover lost future wages or future decreases in income if you can demonstrate that the injuries you sustained in the accident prevent you from performing your current job and that this forces you to take a lower-paying employment. This will need to be supported by qualified wit...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: Is there a cap on the amount of damages I can recover?

A: No. In Washington State, there is no cap on either general damages or economic (out-of-pocket) damages. You cannot, however, receive punitive damages in Washington.

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: I was injured in a car accident and haven't been able to work for a month. Is it possible for me to get compensated for lost wages?

A: Yes. All actual past loss of wages from the date of the accident to the day you return to work is considered income loss. You are entitled to a full refund of all lost wages. Although you are entitled to pay for time off work, keep in mind that your employer will need to verify that you were unable...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: I was injured in an accident, but the driver who caused the accident is not insured. What can I do?

A: Your own uninsured/underinsured insurance coverage may apply if the other driver is uninsured or has minimal insurance. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is included in many auto insurance policies. We'll be able to tell if yours does. On your behalf, we will investigate all options and seek ...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: How can I prove that a product was defective?

A: This is dependent on the liability theory pursued by the injured party. When bringing a negligence claim, the plaintiff must show that the defect that caused the injury was caused by the defendant's failure to exercise reasonable care in the product's design, manufacture, and marketing. The general ...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: Can I sue the apartment complex if I fall on the apartment stairs?

A: All property owners have a legal obligation to ensure that their premises are safe for visitors, though the extent of their responsibility will vary depending on the visitor's status. A landowner who actively invites others onto his or her property for business purposes, for example, will be require...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: What if I was bitten by a dog while trespassing?

A: According to the statute, a dog owner can only be held liable for damages caused by a dog bite victim if the victim was on public property or was lawfully on private property at the time of the bite. This means that if you were trespassing when you were bitten, you cannot hold the dog owner solely r...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: Should I speak with the insurance adjuster first before seeking legal advice?

A: Always consult an experienced accident attorney before speaking with an adjuster. The adjuster's job is to reduce the amount paid to satisfy your claim by the insurance company, and they're looking for information they can use to do so. Allow your lawyer to communicate with the insurance company to ...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Q: Isn't it true that all personal injury claims are based on negligence?

A: The majority of lawsuits are brought as a result of someone else's negligence. If a defendant fails to follow the standard of care that most people in a similar situation would follow, they may be found negligent and liable for the plaintiff's injuries. Intentional wrongs can also lead to lawsuits o...

— Khan Injury Law - Seattle

Other Personal Injury in Seattle

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 351 retrieved reviews and 330 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Consumer intelligence release llb-consumer-intelligence-2026-08-12-r4, derived from llb-depth50-research-2026-08-11-r1, supplies immutable office and brand IDs, market context, evidence-strength tier, and published practice/city memberships.
  • Historical review aggregates calculated from the retrieved public-review history captured through Apr 6, 2026.
  • Aggregate business and review-analysis fields rendered from the same exported firm record used by the city rankings; reviewer identities and review text are not republished.

Freshness

  • Business profile last collected: 2026-04-02 14:07:53.
  • Review records last collected: 2026-04-06 17:01:52; derived metrics last analyzed: 2026-08-02 20:36:25.
  • 351 total Google reviews tracked; 351 reviews retrieved; 330 text reviews analyzed.
  • Consumer intelligence release published 2026-08-12; that is a derived-release date, not a new profile or review observation.
  • Review-history snapshot: Apr 6, 2026; retrieved coverage: 100% of the tracked-review total.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Build packaging timestamp: 2026-08-03 08:34:48 UTC; this is not a source-refresh date.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Historical comparison tiles appear only when retrieved review history reaches both full twelve-month windows and each window meets the rating-count threshold.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • A within-market percentile is a relative position inside the fixed market cohort. It is not a probability, national rank, or legal-performance grade.
  • A theme appears only when that office result passes the published minimum sample, confidence, and external precision gates; absence is not proof that the topic never appears.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all Seattle personal injury lawyers ranked by public review signals
Explore Washington personal injury markets → Compare this office in the Car Accident cohort → Report an outdated or incorrect detail on this profile →