Heuer Fischer, P.A. Reviews, Ratings & Analysis

5353 Wayzata Blvd Ste 600, St Louis Park, MN 55416

4.9
56 Google reviews
Verified Profile

Heuer Fischer, P.A. is a personal injury attorney in St Louis Park, Minnesota with a 4.9-star rating across 56 tracked Google reviews. The current build retrieved 56 reviews for this profile and analyzed 40 text reviews. The firm replies to 0% of public reviews, 63% of analyzed reviewers explicitly recommend it, and communication is mentioned in 18% of analyzed reviews. Its review pattern is highly consistent based on a consistency index of 92.5.

The most common review themes are explicit recommendation (63%), professionalism (35%), and case results (30%). Reviews in the sample mention matters involving car accident. Use these signals as due-diligence inputs rather than proof of specialty or likely outcome.

Firm Snapshot Table

Use this table to see the difference between the firm's public review footprint, the reviews retrieved into the current build, and the text reviews that feed the NLP metrics on this page.

MetricValueWhat it means
Tracked Google reviews56Public review count currently visible on the profile.
Reviews retrieved56Review records stored in the current build.
Text reviews analyzed40Review texts used for NLP-derived praise, complaint, and communication metrics.
Owner response rate0%Share of retrieved reviews with an owner reply.
Explicit recommendation rate63%Share of analyzed reviewers who explicitly recommend the firm.
Communication mentions18%Share of analyzed reviews that mention communication.
Consistency index92.5Higher scores indicate a more consistently positive rating pattern.

Case Types Mentioned in Reviews

car accident

Quick Stats

Reviews/Month
0.5
Avg Review Length
209 chars
Local Guide %
30%

Practice Areas

Criminal justice attorneyLaw firmLegal services

What Our Data Shows

The sections below break this firm into measurable signals: responsiveness, communication mentions, review consistency, praised attributes, complaint themes, and recent review examples. Read them together, not as isolated stats.

Performance Metrics

Based on analysis of 40 text reviews in the current build.

Owner Response Rate
0%
replies to reviews
Explicit Recommendation Rate
63%
of analyzed reviewers
Communication Mentions
18%
of analyzed reviews
Professionalism Mentions
35%
of analyzed reviews
Results Mentions
30%
of analyzed reviews
Compassion Mentions
5%
of analyzed reviews

Rating Distribution

5 star
53 (95%)
4 star
2 (3.6%)
3 star
0 (0%)
2 star
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (1.8%)
98% positive reviews 3% negative reviews Consistency index: 92.5

What Clients Praise

explicit recommendation 62.5% of reviews
professionalism 35% of reviews
case results 30% of reviews
communication 17.5% of reviews
expertise 10% of reviews

Common Concerns (from negative reviews)

poor communication (200%)

Recent Reviews

Jessica Koehler
2 weeks ago
Robel Kelib

I am very grateful for the outstanding service I received.He was knowledgeable, responsive, and truly cared about my case.Everything was explaind clearly, and the outcome was better than I expected. I highly recommend him foranyone in need of legal help. .

3 months ago
Tayor Flynn

Jim and Jonathan and there support staff did a superior job for my wife and I. I highly recommend there firm if you have a personal injury matter.

Edited 5 months ago
Mario G

Very kind and considerate fully satisfied will recommend you to family and friends

5 months ago
Jacob Weber

I was referred here for my accident from my coworker as they had a good experience with them as well. I have been very happy with them working through all of the issues of being T-Boned between insurance and the medical issues. They got me a more than fair settlement and I was able to get a hold o...

6 months ago

Sources, Freshness & Limitations

Sources

  • Google Business profile data for the firm, including address, phone, website, business attributes, and aggregate public rating.
  • 56 retrieved reviews and 40 text reviews used to calculate praise, complaint, communication, and response metrics for this profile.
  • Recent review excerpts and business details rendered from the same exported firm dataset used by the city rankings.

Freshness

  • Profile last scraped: 2026-04-02 14:43:29.
  • Profile last exported into the current build: 2026-04-02 14:43:29.
  • 56 total Google reviews tracked; 56 reviews retrieved; 40 text reviews analyzed.
  • Methodology version: 2026.04.07. Exported at: 2026-04-06 22:46:09 UTC.
  • Latest source timestamps in scope — profiles: 2026-04-02 14:43:29, reviews: 2026-04-02 14:46:56, analysis: 2026-04-06 17:04:28.

Limitations

  • Public review volume, retrieved review records, and text reviews analyzed are different counts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
  • Review-derived case-type and praise signals show what appears in the sample; they do not independently verify board certification or case outcomes.
  • This page helps you evaluate a firm’s public client-feedback footprint, but hiring decisions still require direct due diligence.
← View all St Louis Park personal injury lawyers ranked by client reviews